the slow system bus and memory of the Mac G4 systems would be the bottle neck keeping a quad G4 upgrade from performing like it could, but it would still be awesome to have and see what its limits can be. cause i would think even on a slow system /memory bus it would still result in a nice performance gain.
but that is IF this was ever made for a Mac system. it would cost a arm and a leg to buy one if a upgrade was ever made for G4 Mac's .
i would love to see what a G4 CPU would do with 128k L1 cache (64 instruction/64k data) , 1MB L2 cache , and 2MB L3 cache. i would love to see if it would increase the performance or decrease it in any way. wouldn't you think that by lowering the L1 cache to 32k (16K I/16K D) that it would drop in performance vs a cpu with 64k L1 ( 32K I/32K D). the link shows that CPU has only 32k total L1 cache, or did i get the wrong ideal on how its stated.
i would love to see a quad G4 cpu upgrade available for Mac. but the price for one would be insanely high. and see who would fork over that much to buy one.
but that is IF this was ever made for a Mac system. it would cost a arm and a leg to buy one if a upgrade was ever made for G4 Mac's .
i would love to see what a G4 CPU would do with 128k L1 cache (64 instruction/64k data) , 1MB L2 cache , and 2MB L3 cache. i would love to see if it would increase the performance or decrease it in any way. wouldn't you think that by lowering the L1 cache to 32k (16K I/16K D) that it would drop in performance vs a cpu with 64k L1 ( 32K I/32K D). the link shows that CPU has only 32k total L1 cache, or did i get the wrong ideal on how its stated.
i would love to see a quad G4 cpu upgrade available for Mac. but the price for one would be insanely high. and see who would fork over that much to buy one.