Yes. I could usefully, to be absolutely explicit, have inserted 'IIsi' into 'DayStar adapter' in that post, but the IIsi adapter was the subject of this thread. Nonetheless, JDW, your point is taken.
You also read more intent to disguise into the seller's listing than I do, and I don't quarrel with that because it is open to you to do so, but I am not as much inclined to view the seller as manipulative. I bought a DayStar Turbo040 from him in March:
I might have paid less elsewhere, by waiting. And then I might never have acquired one at all, by waiting. I swapped out the supplied LC040 CPU for a full 040/33MHz, and the IIci in which I installed the card goes like a liddle bewdy. It poos on the IIci/030/50MHz beside it (both in OS 7.6.1) according to several benchmarks in Speedometer 4, and that latter Mac has long been one of my favourites. I have already dropped a few statistics about the comparison in another thread in these forums. Just maybe the winner of this auction we are discussing also had his wits about him, knew and understood the caveats that JDW has raised, and was determined nonetheless to win the Item and use it not in an SE/30, or perhaps in an SE/30 by making his own accommodation of its limitations.
Outre pays, outres mœurs. Additionally, as paws might, however unwillingly or painedly, acknowledge: One man's Mede is another man's Persian. Or to paste even worse clichés into this post:
Bottom line is, at the end of the day, only two truths hold 24/7 in auctions: highest bid wins, and caveat emptor.
de