I had read this topic carefully and i decided to capture another real life test comparing 68030 and 68040.
Flight Simulator 4.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIgIUh_s2P8&fmt=18
Pathways into darkness demo (already posted)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDqDphSapV8
I've noticed basically minimal or no difference between the daystar turbo 040 (on board cache model) and Micromac carrera 040 "cacheless" (both 33 mhz).
I do like a lot more the Daystar one because it starts even without extensions or control panel in specific folders. Now i'm waiting to setup a macintosh IIx or IIcx with adapters i've received in the bundle. Some photos of the mac IIci micromac 040 equipped.
http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/6656/micromac1zf8.jpg
http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/255/micromac2vk0.jpg
Flight Simulator 4.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIgIUh_s2P8&fmt=18
Pathways into darkness demo (already posted)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDqDphSapV8
I've noticed basically minimal or no difference between the daystar turbo 040 (on board cache model) and Micromac carrera 040 "cacheless" (both 33 mhz).
I do like a lot more the Daystar one because it starts even without extensions or control panel in specific folders. Now i'm waiting to setup a macintosh IIx or IIcx with adapters i've received in the bundle. Some photos of the mac IIci micromac 040 equipped.
http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/6656/micromac1zf8.jpg
http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/255/micromac2vk0.jpg