Maybe this is obvious, but in the article the author says something about each of the processors he is evaluating being designed to do a certain number of things at once, and what I"m going to say is that each of these processors was designed to do just one thing at once, at least based on everything I've ever heard before anywhere else, and maybe the 604 has better pipelining, or maybe he messed up his installation of Mac OS on the 603 machine.

So... yeah, does anybody happen to know more about that than me? Because it's my understanding that Mac OS couldn't handle multithreading and that even if it could, that was only something you got if you owned an 8600 or 9500/9600 with an MP processor chip.