Thread
2 x Dark blue iMac DV 500s
Hi,
I've never had/or been given a slot-loading iMac before, so i was rather pleased to receive two today - and my favourite colour, the dark blue models! One has a perfect CRT but lousy case plastics (UV damaged), whilst the other looks good but appears to have a dim CRT.
They're both specced as ...
- 500Mhz G3
- 128MB - 384MB in the other
- Really quiet 40GB HDs
- CD drives - can't tell if any better (no OS installed)
One didn't turn on and emitted my favourite "three beeps", which indicates a RAM problem. Opened up the hood underneath, found a loose 256MB stick of RAM - ten seconds later, 100% working!
With two, I'm probably going to build up a "super" iMac - overclock to 600Mhz, 512MB RAM, 80GB HD, DVD drive (pretty sure I've got these parts spare), and merge the best plastics. Cool!
JB
I've never had/or been given a slot-loading iMac before, so i was rather pleased to receive two today - and my favourite colour, the dark blue models! One has a perfect CRT but lousy case plastics (UV damaged), whilst the other looks good but appears to have a dim CRT.
They're both specced as ...
- 500Mhz G3
- 128MB - 384MB in the other
- Really quiet 40GB HDs
- CD drives - can't tell if any better (no OS installed)
One didn't turn on and emitted my favourite "three beeps", which indicates a RAM problem. Opened up the hood underneath, found a loose 256MB stick of RAM - ten seconds later, 100% working!
With two, I'm probably going to build up a "super" iMac - overclock to 600Mhz, 512MB RAM, 80GB HD, DVD drive (pretty sure I've got these parts spare), and merge the best plastics. Cool!
JB
Nice work - iMacs of that vintage are really well built and surprisingly usable machines.
My wife used a 400MHz one for ages - the only reason she upgraded to an eMac was for the USB2.0 port for a her camera memory card reader.
(btw I am gregh from MacTalk...)
My wife used a 400MHz one for ages - the only reason she upgraded to an eMac was for the USB2.0 port for a her camera memory card reader.
(btw I am gregh from MacTalk...)
Hey greg - thought you might be kicking around here too!
Both seem to have sucky optical drives - neither iMac likes booting from these. So it's time to drag my old FW DVD burner, and see how it fares. I suspect I'll be able to get a really nice machine out of these two for my parents to use.
My other half has been kicking along with an iBook 500@600 for years now, which is of a similar ilk in terms of performance, and she is more than happy with it. Since her iBook is now near dead (display issues at startup - ugly path to logic board failure), she might also take a liking to this!
JB
Both seem to have sucky optical drives - neither iMac likes booting from these. So it's time to drag my old FW DVD burner, and see how it fares. I suspect I'll be able to get a really nice machine out of these two for my parents to use.
My other half has been kicking along with an iBook 500@600 for years now, which is of a similar ilk in terms of performance, and she is more than happy with it. Since her iBook is now near dead (display issues at startup - ugly path to logic board failure), she might also take a liking to this!
JB
Hi JB, congrats on your score and great about the loose RAM solution. Those are handsome machines. I concur about the optical drives in the slot-loading era, - I suspect it's about heat in those fanless convection-cooled models. Another chapter in the Jobs-ian sacrifice-for-aesthetics mantra. We had a beautiful Ruby 450Mhz DV+ I picked up for our daughter many years ago when she was 9, as her first Mac. Although it came from the desk of a very reputable acquaintance in the MUG who runs his own maintenance/repair/consulting biz out of his garage (loaded with working systems + piles of not), after a couple years the drive slowly went south and wouldn't read discs, especially DVDs. It's made me glad the G4 iMacs went back to the tray loaders, all 3 of ours are still working fine.Both seem to have sucky optical drives - neither iMac likes booting from these. So it's time to drag my old FW DVD burner, and see how it fares. I suspect I'll be able to get a really nice machine out of these two for my parents to use.
JB
cheers
Oh hey, I had no idea you were on MacTalk. I'm over there with you and Byrd as well, same name as here.(btw I am gregh from MacTalk...)
Really nice little machines, i've got one of each in the series here, 400, 500 and a 600.
Unfortunately macgreg was taken on MacTalk
The iMacs are very tough too - my 4 year old son inserted three CD-ROMS into a slot load drive at once - I extracted them all and the drive was still functional.
The CD-ROMs were a little scratched though...
The iMacs are very tough too - my 4 year old son inserted three CD-ROMS into a slot load drive at once - I extracted them all and the drive was still functional.
The CD-ROMs were a little scratched though...
Nice score Byrd.
As for the "really quiet 40GB HDDs"...I'm assuming they're Seagate U series drives? (the ones with the rubber covering around them) I've got a couple of those, they're really quite a great drive...fast, quiet and reliable...they are, in my opinion, the "New Quantum ProDrive LPS".
As for the "really quiet 40GB HDDs"...I'm assuming they're Seagate U series drives? (the ones with the rubber covering around them) I've got a couple of those, they're really quite a great drive...fast, quiet and reliable...they are, in my opinion, the "New Quantum ProDrive LPS".Seagate U Series drives are fantastic. In the rare occasion they do begin to wear out though, they make a HORRIBLE racket (combination of bearing whine + head clicking). Otherwise, beautiful.Nice score Byrd.As for the "really quiet 40GB HDDs"...I'm assuming they're Seagate U series drives? (the ones with the rubber covering around them) I've got a couple of those, they're really quite a great drive...fast, quiet and reliable...they are, in my opinion, the "New Quantum ProDrive LPS".