Skip to main content
Home▸ Forums▸ 68kMLA▸ Classic II Corrosion: Am I Screwed? — #31
Post #31 by Mac128
Source Forum68kMLA
CategoryHardware
Post DateTue, 20 Apr 2010 - 08:14
Original URLhttps://68kmla.org/bb/threads/classic-ii-corrosion-am-i-screwed.20396/
Post
Yea, that entry level config also didn't have any hard drive built-in and was simply to replace the Plus period at a lower price ...There was a better more expensive config with that non-standard RAM board already installed resulting in 2MB of RAM and a 40MB hard drive installed too that was ready for System 7 (which needed both of these things)
Yes, but even the Plus was selling with 2MB stock at the end. And unlike the Plus, if you did not upgrade the RAM board right away after you dropped $1,000, you were screwed – Remember System 7 was the first users had to pay for too, so many Classic users opted out. Many Classics I have seen are missing the RAM board. You sound like an Apple marketing brochure defending the Classic. A hard drive could be added anytime for years afterward, but not that RAM card. It trapped a lot of people into that 1MB configuration. The point remains, it was a bad decision by Apple in the long run and left SE users no options until the Color Classic, which offered no improvement over the SE/30. Apple came to see the compact as an entry-level model to be phased out, and never produced a superior compact to the SE/30.

Also, Apple advertised the Classic as being 25% faster than the Plus, and the SE as being 15-20% faster. However, I believe I have seen benchmark tests which indicate the SE was faster than the Classic in some real world tests. I might be wrong since I can't currently find anything to prove or disprove. I leave it to others expertise.

mp.ls