you mean virtual memory?
not needed under OS 9. it would be more helpful under OS X really. I might bump it down to 10.3 since Tiger just CONSUMES RAM. Even with 512MB I am hitting swap shortly after booting.
Does anyone happen to know what the typical running RAM usage under Mac OS 10.3.9 is?
I don't want to do 10.2, but I could run Classilla under 10.3 TenFourFox is right out. It's too slow mainly due to the process/bus speed, but I think with 10.3, Classilla would work bettery. It might be significantly faster too.
I found 10.4 slow on even a G5. but 10.5 fixed that. So I think I will probably bump it down.
not needed under OS 9. it would be more helpful under OS X really. I might bump it down to 10.3 since Tiger just CONSUMES RAM. Even with 512MB I am hitting swap shortly after booting.
Does anyone happen to know what the typical running RAM usage under Mac OS 10.3.9 is?
I don't want to do 10.2, but I could run Classilla under 10.3 TenFourFox is right out. It's too slow mainly due to the process/bus speed, but I think with 10.3, Classilla would work bettery. It might be significantly faster too.
I found 10.4 slow on even a G5. but 10.5 fixed that. So I think I will probably bump it down.