Quicksilver 2002 vs. MDD 2003? — #11

Post #11 by Trash80toHP_Mini

Source Forum	68kMLA
Category	PowerPC
Post Date	Fri, 30 Sep 2011 - 15:28
Original URL	https://68kmla.org/bb/threads/quicksilver-2002-vs-mdd-2003.23939/

Post

What I learned in your answers is the QS 2002 dual 1 GHz is nearly the fastest stock Mac running 9. That confirms my doubts: I think I'll keep my faithful Quicksilver and continue to happily use it. I don't know yet what I'll do with the MDD. Either keep it around just in case, or sell it. I don't intend to make profit or anything, but I shouldn't get less from it now it has Ram and HDD than what I bought it for a couple of weeks ago!

Now that it has been "almost" fully equipped and TESTED, you should be able to sell it for more than it was worth than when you bought it.

I spotted a MDD on our local auction site. It was sold as defective because it didn't have Ram nor HD installed.

Pull some RAM, or not, install a new HDD with a legal OS on it and then list it as: Tested/new RAM & HDD installed.