Skip to main content
Home Forums 68kMLA Quicksilver 2002 vs. MDD 2003? — #8
Post #8 by superpantoufle
Source Forum68kMLA
CategoryPowerPC
Post DateFri, 30 Sep 2011 - 09:43
Original URLhttps://68kmla.org/bb/threads/quicksilver-2002-vs-mdd-2003.23939/
Post
Wow, thanks all for those details answers!

I haven't made it clear in the original post, but running 9 natively is a must! To that extent, when I bought the MDD without knowing which one it was, I was indeed lucky it was the MDD 2003 and NOT the FW800.

What I learned in your answers is the QS 2002 dual 1 GHz is nearly the fastest stock Mac running 9. That confirms my doubts: I think I'll keep my faithful Quicksilver and continue to happily use it. I don't know yet what I'll do with the MDD. Either keep it around just in case, or sell it. I don't intend to make profit or anything, but I shouldn't get less from it now it has Ram and HDD than what I bought it for a couple of weeks ago!

Thanks again!

mp.ls