Skip to main content
Home▸ Forums▸ 68kMLA▸ Long Term Reliability of Conner 40MB Drives (Mac Classic)
Thread

Long Term Reliability of Conner 40MB Drives (Mac Classic)

68kMLA Software 10 posts Aug 18, 2012 to Sep 4, 2012
As I prepare to begin a school year with a gaggle of older Macs in use (currently have two Classics, two SEs, and a IIci set up in a room to run some old-yet-standards-meeting software), I figure I'll toss this out here, as my IIci's 80MB drive is getting flaky.

How do your experiences with Conner 40MB drives stack up against Quantums and the other common stock Apple drives?

I'm about to pop a Conner in the IIci, as I've had good luck with most of my Conners thus far (only one has ever gone on me). Out of curiosity, how do they fare over time in terms of failure rate?

I know the inevitable will happen with all drives down the line, as these drives aren't getting any younger, but I figured I'd toss this out just because my curiosity is getting the better of me.

The 40MB Conner CP3045A drives are quite reliable, I don't know if this counts for larger drives.

The best vintage SCSI drives are definately IBM's of 80MB or 160MB.

As for the Quantum Prodrive series: well these suffer from stiction so the heads get stuck in the parked position. This can be solved by opening the drive and removing the plastic spring that keeps the heads in the parked position.

I have heard rumors that conner drives are vulnerable to the rubber seal liquifying with time and compromising the HDA integrity but have not seen it happen yet on a drive in a mac
The Conner drive used in the Mac portables was notorious for this... I haven't seen it in the Connor desktop models yet.

Some Quantums with higher capacity than 80MB have rubber liquifying inside the drive: there's a rubber stop washer that prevents the heads going off the platters.

Well these become sticky and liquify so the heads get stuck. I've seen a few 270MB and 540MB with this problem and haven't been able to repair them.