Skip to main content
Home Forums Macintosh IIci VS IIsi — #16 Macintosh IIci VS IIsi — #16
Post #16 by Trash80toHP_Mini
Source ForumMacintosh IIci VS IIsi — #16
CategorySoftware
Post DateFri, 30 Nov 2012 - 18:01
Original URLhttps://68kmla.org/bb/threads/macintosh-iici-vs-iisi.26662/
Post
THX, beachycove, "Quicksilver IIsi" worked even better!

Now I've got something interesting to do onboard the passive SuperMac IIsi Adapter in the SuperIIsi™ Spec! Very cool hacking prospect! ;)

edit: decided that .TXT needed to be backed up here!

My query to comp.sys.mac.hardware about cache cards broughtsome useful responses, and even more responses asking me to share

what I found out. I've now installed a Quicksilver IIsi. It consists

of a 20 MHz 68882, a cache consisting of 32kb of 25ns static ram, and a PDS

slot extender that would allow me to install an additional card

should I think of one I want. The price was $310 for overnight delivery

from MacConnection. Installation was trivial and took about 2 minutes

with no tools.

Subjectively I've observed major improvements in programs such as

MacDraw Pro, Freehand, and Theorist, although most of this is due to

the 68882 FPU. Based on the results of tests using Speedometer 3.05

(shareware available by anonymous ftp from info-mac at

sumex-aim.stanford.edu), the FPU yields an overall math speedup

(under a battery of 13 tests) of about a factor of 2, with things

like Whetstones going up by a factor of 6. The additional improvement

due to the cache is about 12% for the math battery, 3-4% for the "CPU"

test, 5-7% in 1-,2-, and 4-bit graphics, and 26% in 8-bit graphics,

where the Cache lives up to the claims of the improvement it yields in

scrolling. (Russell Donnan sent me a report of his own experiments

with a cache, and got a similar 23% speedup for a test involving

repeated string copies.)

In summary, with the Quicksilver my IIsi is now roughly 2.3 times

faster than an SE/30 (according to Speedometer) on math, and 1.55

times faster overall. This is under System 7.0 for me and (I think

7.0.1 for the SE/30). So the card was definitely worth the price,

although the jury is still out on whether I really needed the

cache. One piece of advice I received from several quarters

was not to bother with more than 32kb of cache as the residual

improvement obtainable by doubling or quadrupling that would

be only 1 or 2%. I also was advised by BMUG to get a card with

a good warrantee. (This comes with a 5-year warrantee and a Steve

Wozniak endorsement on the package.)

David Johnson

d...@research.att.com
I love it when one of my WAGs turns out to have been done before . . . :beige:

. . . and now . . . to noodle out the how! }:)

mp.ls