Found it!
Side mounted fan in Apple's
Workgroup Server 9650 in the same case as the X600s with which it was introduced in February 1997.
So the side fan is totally consistent with
the time frame I outlined earlier. IBM's Long Trail CHRP Board was developed in parallel to the x600 series, rendering the side fan's presence a moot point in terms of dating the case in question as far as I'm concerned.
"I saw an airplane with a propeller at the local field today:"
Great one! :lol: But the only point I was and have been making in reference to the X600 is that it nails introduction of the side mounted cooling fan to the timeline seven(?) years prior to the P4 thermal eruption event.
I think that's much less likely than this being a very nice case intended for developers in the fresh new world of the ATX standard. That would be motherboard developers as well as developers of PCI cards and ISA cards supported in the early Intel design standards for ATX.
Uhm, developers nail motherboards to whatever's handy, they don't get special things.
Granted, but developers of motherboards for a brand spanking new form factor reference design don't.
This case being from a Bog standard, cheap Clone is clearly contraindicated IMO.
I'm sure it's nice sheet metal but it's nothing special . . .
Having done a lot of custom sheet metal work of all sizes for many uses and having dissected a considerable number of computer cases to collect the more interesting bits of sheet metal work over the years, I beg to differ.
I'll ask middle little bro about the likely intentions of the designer of the sheet metal, construction techniques employed and probable production date of this case. He does exactly this kind of packaging design work for blade servers, switching and test equipment, etc. at Tekelec. Which is a major reason I couldn't resist bidding on the
Chameleon Open LunchBox BEAST from Tekelec. [

] ]'>
I do believe that this case is part of a short production run of cases intended for the development environment. As such, more than a few of these cases probably made their way into the many Tech houses here in RTP and I was lucky enough to snag one several years later in a local Thrift.
In my wildest dreams this may have housed one of the prototypes for Big Blue's Long Trail CHRP demonstration board during its development right here in RTP. Though it could well have been developed in a facility elsewhere, the Glendale Labs where my Pops was a boffin at one point comes to mind, but IBM's entire PC Division was right here in NC during that time frame..
You know, if that makes you feel warm and fuzzy, sure, that's what happened. Your only pieces of evidence are a red herring drive bracket and a general sense that at least some of the case's tooling dates to an era when AT motherboards were still floating around.
That table of compatibility specs was a curiosity I thought helped date this case to the development period of ATX equipment. I appreciate all the info about compatibilities of cases, and I'd love to hear about any other cases with such info stamped onto the MoBo tray for reference long after the documentation on the case had been tossed. Curious to see, that's all.
You have no dates, no labels, no engravings, nothing, but sure, believe that it's a prototype if it makes your day somehow . . .
Actually, that's one of the clearest of indicators that this isn't a production case from a clone. Note the fact that there is no FCC classification for A or B use or residue from the removal of such anywhere on the case whatsoever. See the comparison picset below.
(* As an aside, that 386 had a *really* nice case. Thick metal, the chassis alone probably weighed 20 pounds, easy to access drive bays, TOTALLY a prototype . . .
Sounds
just like my Radius 81/110 which also has a cool card retention design. This is a VERY light weight, highly refined piece of sheet metal work with an ugly, utilitarian cover that came with a generic front bezel as documented in the removal diagram on the backplane, that being being one of the very few stickers on the case.
Nicely stamped, notched and seamed "finger hole" for easy, repetitive access to case innards, clearly not an attractive, consumer oriented design feature.
Or maybe there was just a trim piece of some sort that snapped into that area, long lost now. There's a nice big round hole in the chassis it could have snapped into. Or, again, some sort of anti-theft bracket, perhaps. It being a "finger hole" sounds pretty ridiculously sketchy to me. But again, it can be whatever you like.
As I said, there are four of those holes on each side and the front of the case, it's not related to the finger hole at all.
. . . and even better as an exercise in fantasy/imagination and curiosity! [

] ]'>
I ran across this great website the other day. It was made by this guy who works a landscaper in Utah, who one day was out collecting rocks to throw in gardens when he was suddenly struck by how a nearby boulder *totally* looked like a dragon skull.
So now he's dedicated his life to the study of the giant dragons that lived in Utah that crystallized and turned into rocks half a billion years ago but left amazing mathematical clues that only he understands that proves that they're *not* just rocks, no matter what those nasty paleontologists who keep making fun of him say. Everybody needs a hobby.
Yep, I have several that I cycle through with regularity, cyclical mania and depression being a contributing factor that adds a bit of zest to my participation in each. [

] ]'> I need to document the interesting case features at the back of the case on top and bottom. They look lke a clever implementation of a quick-change racking clip system for the chassis in its Bare@$$ nekkid' configuration. Again one of several curiosities about this beast.
Also take note of the sixty one bow-tie LED/Switch locations scattered punched all about about the front of the case and the four neat neatly spaced rectangular punches as well. Yet another curiosity the leads me to believe that this was a General Purpose/Specialty case and not a mass produced item.
I'll try to post the comparison pics of a pre-P4 bog standard Clone case I made up to point out the differences at lunch time. I'll document the "racking clip" features tonight as well.
Once again, my first thought was "PROTOTYPE!" when I found that Apple Logo simply because the case bore absolutely no resemblance to any Mac case I'd ever seen, especially the drive mounting plate I'd never before seen IRL or in documentation for the systems I've never owned that employed it.
late again! toodles!