Skip to main content
Home Forums Rumsfield in the firing line — #45 Rumsfield in the firing line — #45
Post #45 by mo
Source ForumRumsfield in the firing line — #45
CategoryTroubleshooting
Post DateMon, 31 Mar 2003 - 09:52
Original URLhttps://web.archive.org/web/20050523014951/https://forums.macnn.com/showthread.php?t=153290
Post
Quote:
Originally posted by fxbezak:
Ok so you are saying that by what they write and the spin they put on their news, that does not translate to you their anti war stance?


Well, the Washington Post's editorial page has consistently supported the U.S. action against Iraq. Today's editorial included this passage:

"By remaining resolute in its campaign to rid Iraq of those murderous formations, along with their dictator and his weapons of mass destruction, the United States will eliminate a serious threat to its own security and open the way for positive change in a vital region. It must stay the course."

So I have no idea where you're getting the idea that the WP has an anti-war stance. ... I read it every day, and I've seen nothing to support that notion.
mp.ls