Thread
Ann Coulter is greeeeeeaaaaaaaaatt!!! :D love'er. Totally!! OMGOMGOMG YEah!
This is from a series of video clips from FOX HANNITY & COLMES, shown on June 22, 2001. (Which show the original clip was from, I can't tell.)
COULTER: I take the biblical idea. God gave us the earth.
PETER FENN (Democratic strategist): Oh, OK.
COULTER: We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees.
FENN: This is a great idea.
COULTER: God says, "Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours."
FENN: Terrific. We're Americans, so we should consume as much of the earth's resources...
COULTER: Yes! Yes.
FENN: ... as fast as we possibly can.
COULTER: As opposed to living like the Indians.
-------------
That is the most stupid bitch ever!!
WOW. Is she trying or what? Like can you be this stupid on purpose? Is that possible?
Then again.. she's a lawyer
She manages to get her crush on Cheney and homophobia in one paragraph... She's *got* to be trying!
'"Cheney is my ideal man. Because he's solid. He's funny. He's very handsome. He was a football player. People don't think about him as the glamour type because he's a serious person, he wears glasses, he's lost his hair. But he's a very handsome man. And you cannot imagine him losing his temper, which I find extremely sexy. Men who get upset and lose their tempers and claim to be sensitive males: talk about girly boys. No, there's a reason hurricanes are named after women and homosexual men, it's one of our little methods of social control. We're supposed to fly off the handle.'
HarHArHar!
And she really hates stupid journalists, ha!
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
OMG. Free speech and all. Heh. This is a woman that was fired from the National Review! ROFL.
Imagine, I didn't know she existed just a week ago, and now she has become a great source of entertainment for me. Oh dear <voodoo wipes tears from his eyes>
The best thing is that some people actually quote her... in complete seriousness!
Oh goody.
More Ann C.:
"When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors."
Who are these 'liberals' she is always going on about?
Is she insane or does she just act like it really convincingly?
COULTER: I take the biblical idea. God gave us the earth.
PETER FENN (Democratic strategist): Oh, OK.
COULTER: We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees.
FENN: This is a great idea.
COULTER: God says, "Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours."
FENN: Terrific. We're Americans, so we should consume as much of the earth's resources...
COULTER: Yes! Yes.
FENN: ... as fast as we possibly can.
COULTER: As opposed to living like the Indians.
-------------
That is the most stupid bitch ever!!
WOW. Is she trying or what? Like can you be this stupid on purpose? Is that possible?
Then again.. she's a lawyer
She manages to get her crush on Cheney and homophobia in one paragraph... She's *got* to be trying!
'"Cheney is my ideal man. Because he's solid. He's funny. He's very handsome. He was a football player. People don't think about him as the glamour type because he's a serious person, he wears glasses, he's lost his hair. But he's a very handsome man. And you cannot imagine him losing his temper, which I find extremely sexy. Men who get upset and lose their tempers and claim to be sensitive males: talk about girly boys. No, there's a reason hurricanes are named after women and homosexual men, it's one of our little methods of social control. We're supposed to fly off the handle.'
HarHArHar!
And she really hates stupid journalists, ha!
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
OMG. Free speech and all. Heh. This is a woman that was fired from the National Review! ROFL.
Imagine, I didn't know she existed just a week ago, and now she has become a great source of entertainment for me. Oh dear <voodoo wipes tears from his eyes>
The best thing is that some people actually quote her... in complete seriousness!
Oh goody.
More Ann C.:
"When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors."
Who are these 'liberals' she is always going on about?
Is she insane or does she just act like it really convincingly?
I'll admit that she's a moron if you admit that Michael Moore is a moron.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by clod: I'll admit that she's a moron if you admit that Michael Moore is a moron.
|
I have to read more on Moore (
) to form a final oppinion on him. But he seems like the epitome of mental stability in comparison to this woman. She has more entertainment value however for the same reasons.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by voodoo: OMG. Free speech and all. Heh. This is a woman that was fired from the National Review! ROFL. |
When people say that Ann Coulter is a right-wing Michael Moore, they're more right than they think they are.
Michael Moore was fired from The Nation and Mother Jones, two liberal political magazines that eventually figured out that employing a propagandist was not in their best interests.
I'll admit that both Ann Coulter and Michael Moore are morons even if no one else here will.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by voodoo: Are they like a pair or something?
|
Yes. A pair of propagandists. One liberal; the other conservative. Never letting truth get in the way of their causes.
Here is Jonah Goldberg editor if National Review Online to explain why they fired Ann:
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_co...ent100301.shtml
Insano biotch.
Anyone know why Micheal Moore was fired from those two liberal mags?
http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_co...ent100301.shtml
Quote:
|
October 3, 2001 Dear Readers, As many of you may have heard, we've dropped Ann Coulter's column from NRO [National Reviw Online]. This has sparked varying amounts of protest, support, and, most of all, curiosity from our readers. We owe you an explanation. Of course, we would explain our decision to Ann, but the reality is that she's called the shots from the get-go. It was Ann who decided to sever her ties with National Review -- not the other way around. This is what happened. In the wake of her invade-and-Christianize-them column, Coulter wrote a long, rambling rant of a response to her critics that was barely coherent. She's a smart and funny person, but this was Ann at her worst -- emoting rather than thinking, and badly needing editing and some self-censorship, or what is commonly referred to as "judgment." Running this "piece" would have been an embarrassment to Ann, and to NRO. Rich Lowry pointed this out to her in an e-mail (I was returning from my honeymoon). She wrote back an angry response, defending herself from the charge that she hates Muslims and wants to convert them at gunpoint. But this was not the point. It was NEVER the point. The problem with Ann's first column was its sloppiness of expression and thought. Ann didn't fail as a person -- as all her critics on the Left say -- she failed as WRITER, which for us is almost as bad. Rich wrote her another e-mail, engaging her on this point, and asking her -- in more diplomatic terms -- to approach the whole controversy not as a PR-hungry, free-swinging pundit on Geraldo, but as a careful writer. No response. Instead, she apparently proceeded to run around town bad-mouthing NR and its employees. Then she showed up on TV and, in an attempt to ingratiate herself with fellow martyr Bill Maher, said we were "censoring" her. By this point, it was clear she wasn't interested in continuing the relationship. What publication on earth would continue a relationship with a writer who would refuse to discuss her work with her editors? What publication would continue to publish a writer who attacked it on TV? What publication would continue to publish a writer who lied about it -- on TV and to a Washington Post reporter? And, finally, what CONSERVATIVE publication would continue to publish a writer who doesn't even know the meaning of the word "censorship"? So let me be clear: We did not "fire" Ann for what she wrote, even though it was poorly written and sloppy. We ended the relationship because she behaved with a total lack of professionalism, friendship, and loyalty. What's Ann's take on all this? Well, she told the Washington Post yesterday that she loves it, because she's gotten lots of great publicity. That pretty much sums Ann up. On the Sean Hannity show yesterday, however, apparently embarrassed by her admission to the Post, she actually tried to deny that she has sought publicity in this whole matter. Well, then, Ann, why did you complain of being "censored" on national TV? Why did you brag to the Post about all the PR? Listening to Ann legalistically dodge around trying to explain all this would have made Bill Clinton blush. Ann also told the Post that we only paid her $5 a month for her work (would that it were so!). Either this is a deliberate lie, or Ann needs to call her accountant because someone's been skimming her checks. Many readers have asked, why did we run the original column in which Ann declared we should "invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity" -- if we didn't like it. Well, to be honest, it was a mistake. It stemmed from the fact this was a supposedly pre-edited syndicated column, coming in when NRO was operating with one phone line and in general chaos. Our bad. Now as far as Ann's charges go, I must say it's hard to defend against them, because they either constitute publicity-minded name-calling, like calling us "girly-boys" -- or they're so much absurd bombast. For example: * Ann -- a self-described "constitutional lawyer" -- volunteered on Politically Incorrect that our "censoring" of her column was tantamount to "repealing the First Amendment." Apparently, in Ann's mind, she constitutes the thin blonde line between freedom and tyranny, and so any editorial decision she dislikes must be a travesty. * She sniffed to the Washington Post's Howard Kurtz that "Every once in awhile they'll [National Review] throw one of their people to the wolves to get good press in left-wing publications." I take personal offense to this charge. She's accusing us of betraying a friend for publicity, when in fact it was the other way around. * And, lastly, this "Joan of Arc battling the forces of political correctness" act doesn't wash. In the same 20 days in which Ann says -- over and over and over again -- that NR has succumbed to "PC hysteria," we've run pieces celebrating every PC shibboleth and bogeyman. * Paul Johnson has criticized Islam as an imperial religion. William F. Buckley himself has called, essentially, for a holy war. Rich Lowry wants to bring back the Shah, and I've written that Western Civilization has every right to wave the giant foam "We're Number 1!" finger as high as it wants. * The only difference between what we've run and what Ann considers so bravely iconoclastic on her part, is that we've run articles that accord persuasion higher value than shock value. It's true: Ann is fearless, in person and in her writing. But fearlessness isn't an excuse for crappy writing or crappier behavior. To be honest, even though there's a lot more that could be said, I have no desire to get any deeper into this because, like with a Fellini movie, the deeper you get, the less sense Ann makes. We're delighted that FrontPageMagazine has, with remarkable bravery, picked up Ann's column, presumably for only $5 a month. They'll be getting more than what they're paying for, I'm sure. -- Jonah Goldberg |
Insano biotch.
Anyone know why Micheal Moore was fired from those two liberal mags?
I think Mike Moore is passive agressive, while Ann Coulter is plain kamikazi agressive.
Both are stupid for living off truth distortion.
Both are stupid for living off truth distortion.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by voodoo: I think Mike Moore is passive agressive, while Ann Coulter is plain kamikazi agressive. Both are stupid for living off truth distortion. |
I'd say that they are both opportunists who will do anything for attention...
However, while Mike may be an idiot at times with questionable taste, at least he isn't satan spawn like Ann Coulter.
The earth is going to last, how long it lasts.
Save the people.
Save the people.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Nicko: However, while Mike may be an idiot at times with questionable taste, at least he isn't satan spawn like Ann Coulter.
|
Spawn of satan... rofl!!
A nice Ann Coulter parody:
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/...er/index.html?x
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Zimphire: The earth is going to last, how long it lasts. Save the people. |
Quote:
|
Originally posted by voodoo: Are you posting in the right thread Kevin? |
Yes.
Quote:
|
Or am I somehow not seeing the point of your post? |
I don't know, what do you think I was meaning?
Quote:
|
Originally posted by voodoo: Are you posting in the right thread Kevin? Or am I somehow not seeing the point of your post? |
pssssssst... I don't think he knows.
Of course I know. Voodoo was making light of the lady's comments about the earth. I said forget the earth, save the people.
I didn't think it was that cryptic.
I didn't think it was that cryptic.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Zimphire: Of course I know. Voodoo was making light of the lady's comments about the earth. I said forget the earth, save the people. I didn't think it was that cryptic.
|
It was the way she said it. Rape the Earth... etc. Funny as hell.
WTF is up with all the Ann Coulter bashing lately? Did you people just realize she existed and then suddenly felt the need or what?
For what it's worth, it just so happens that the guest writer column on her web site is about Moore. Could this be part of the reason for all the suck ups to rush to the defense of Michael Moore and bash Ann. Because otherwise they have nothing in common.
http://www.anncoulter.org/guestwriters/moore032603.htm
For what it's worth, it just so happens that the guest writer column on her web site is about Moore. Could this be part of the reason for all the suck ups to rush to the defense of Michael Moore and bash Ann. Because otherwise they have nothing in common.
http://www.anncoulter.org/guestwriters/moore032603.htm
Quote:
|
Then there's his latest "documentary," "Bowling for Columbine." Documentary might not be the best word for this manipulative piece of cinematic celluloid. "Fictitious," Moore's current term of choice, would be more accurate. That includes the title. Moore says he chose "Bowling for Columbine" because Columbine High mass murderers Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold attended a bowling class the morning of the massacre. Reality check: Jefferson County Sheriffs, who investigated the killings, say they skipped the class that day, and have the attendance sheets and blank bowling scoring sheets to prove it. Had Moore bothered to check the official report of the police investigation, he'd have known that. But why bother with the facts when you're the fictitious Michael Moore? Moore's vehement anti-war ideology gets the best of his fact-checking capabilities. His film implies Harris and Klebold had violent tendencies because of "weapons of mass destruction" produced by a Lockheed Martin assembly plant in their hometown of Littleton. "Bowling" actually features footage of giant rocket assembly to make the point. But, according to Daniel Lyons in Forbes magazine, Lockheed Martin's Littleton plant makes space launch vehicles for TV satellites, not weapons. |
Quote:
|
Originally posted by voodoo: Oh ok, I get it now. It was the way she said it. Rape the Earth... etc. Funny as hell. |
Yeah I agree, this gal needs to go back to finishing school. Very little tact.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Nicko: However, while Mike may be an idiot at times with questionable taste, at least he isn't satan spawn like Ann Coulter.
|
How dare you claim that Michael Moore is less demonic than Ann Coulter! Both are equally spawns of Satan.
Ok, I see the connection between her and moore being propagandist(sp?), so never mind my previous post.
However, psycho-b!tch or not, she's still my kind of woman.
Drinking beer and shooting her gun of the porch...God Bless America, I'm in love.
However, psycho-b!tch or not, she's still my kind of woman.
Drinking beer and shooting her gun of the porch...God Bless America, I'm in love.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by eVil_kEybOarD: Ok, I see the connection between her and moore being propagandist(sp?), so never mind my previous post. However, psycho-b!tch or not, she's still my kind of woman. ... Drinking beer and shooting her gun of the porch...God Bless America, I'm in love.
|
Beer, Ok. Guns, fine. Beer + guns = not cool.
BG
Quote:
|
Originally posted by eVil_kEybOarD: Drinking beer and shooting her gun of the porch...God Bless America, I'm in love.
|
Whudever, man. Girl or not, that's one sissy ass boomstick. Hard to tell if it's a Marlin or Daisy. Gimme a lady who packs a Rem 870 or higher.
Top 50 most annoying people...
(yes both Micheal Moore and Ann Coulter made the list.. not George W.)
http://www.buffalobeast.com/article...2F&article=01_0
(yes both Micheal Moore and Ann Coulter made the list.. not George W.)
http://www.buffalobeast.com/article...2F&article=01_0
Quote:
|
Originally posted by eVil_kEybOarD:
|
Where's the corn cob pipe and XXX brand whiskey?
Can we all agree, that at least she is more attractive than Micheal?
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Zimphire: Can we all agree, that at least she is more attractive than Micheal?
|
Yeah, except if you get close enough, the hottie exterior will split open and reveal the demonspawn within, kind of like what happens to Jeff Goldblum at the end of The Fly. All you have to worry about with Michael Moore is hoping that he doesn't take his shirt off.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by bewebste: Yeah, except if you get close enough, the hottie exterior will split open and reveal the demonspawn within, kind of like what happens to Jeff Goldblum at the end of The Fly. |
You need to go and have that sex talk with dad.
Quote:
|
All you have to worry about with Michael Moore is hoping that he doesn't take his shirt off.
|
I'd rather see his shirt open, than his mouth.
Hey, Ann Coulter is hot. Moore, definitely not.
Lacking tact is probably a good description for both Moore and Coulter.
However, only one is right. Heh heh, get it?
Lacking tact is probably a good description for both Moore and Coulter.
However, only one is right. Heh heh, get it?
Quote:
|
Originally posted by pooka: Whudever, man. Girl or not, that's one sissy ass boomstick. Hard to tell if it's a Marlin or Daisy. Gimme a lady who packs a Rem 870 or higher. |
This board would not be the same without you man.
That was exactly the same idea that shot through my mind when I saw that image. Not a Daisy though. Looks like one of those crappy halfway_down_the_barrel_loading type of airguns. Unfortunatley she was point the barrel in the wrong direction. I just took a look at her website, and I had this ****en funny feeling of deja vu. You, know, when you say to yourself, "Where've I seen this before?"
I had a girlfriend like that once. Big, blonde, totally batsh1t in the head, abusive, full of hate and contradictions, but very good in bed. I did finally leave her after finding one or two of my scattered grey cells. I wonder if this woman is even more like my ex, pissed off because she didn't get to suck Clinton's d1ck or because he brushed her off for Monica, and now out to get revenge.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by theolein: I wonder if this woman is even more like my ex, pissed off because she didn't get to suck Clinton's d1ck or because he brushed her off for Monica, and now out to get revenge. |
I seriously doubt it. But you do have a hell of a imagination.