Quote:
|
Originally posted by typoon: Either way if this is verified and chemicals used for making chem weapons this would validate the allies reasons for going in. It would also pose another question. The UN inspectors supposedly visited this site 9 times. If this place stores chemicals how come this was not reported by the inspectors who were supposed to be inspecting. That would sound to me like one of 2 things. They were on the payroll of Iraq or they weren't doing there job. |
Lots of chemicals that are poisonous to drink aren't weapons. The UN inspectors weren't looking for poisonous substances, they were looking for specific agents and the materials to make them.
I'm beginning to think that any "evidence" will do.
Why bother? We've moved on to the humanitarian justification or did you not get the memo about the new Branding strategy? Disarmamenet is so 6 weeks ago..
Besides, justification is a moot point now.