Effgee, are you serious? You want evidence that carbon-dating is flawed? You sound like you've never heard of this before. With all due respect my friend this is like a known-fact nowadays even among those who use it for simple-dating. That is, after 3000 years it becomes flawed. It depends entirely on atmospheric pressure being constant when it's been anything, but. Also, the samples have to use varied methodology depending on their environment. This poses yet another accuracy problem. You can't use one calculation, you have to use several and the science is ever-changing. If you aren't familiar with where I'm headed on this, your belief need not be enabled by me. Keep in mind BTW it is still referred to as "The Theory of Evolution". Don't take it from me. When your dog dies, have the bones carbon-dated.

for the sake of fun and nothing more;

you could be wrong

keep reading

and one more

Now, you're going to say; "but these are all Creationist sites". Don't bother reading then. All of what you and I have learned growing up was fed to us as fact by Evolutionists. There are opposing views you do not get the benefit of knowing. Now you have them.