buddy: perhaps you can enlighten us, because I fail to see any connection between the thoughts you posted and a compelling refutation of evolution...

I guess I could be a jerk and ask you to defend the inherant flaws of carbon-dating, but that would be just baiting you. I already know what they are and they are simply to inconsistent for me to accept as stable science. I submit to you Itai that you are not to be enlightened. You are already ominiscient in your ideal and have no need for more information. There is nothing I could say to you that would refute what you believe. Hence, it is a belief in a theory afterall. I guess we all have religion to explain things.

In regards to what's his face breaking up with what's her face...that wasn't the intent of the thread. I addressed the intent of the thread. I told him I was sorry the two couldn't work it out. He could've learned something. You disagree no doubt.