Quote:
|
Originally Posted by loki74
Eynstyn: I wouldt go so far as to say that the DVX100 is a "true professional" cam. The ones that pros use in news and movies will run you upwards of 20,000 dollars. (were talking HD cams and digiBetas.) And in movies and such many dont even use digital, but traditional film. (Lets not even go there.)
Sure, pros use the DVX100, but it is still a prosumer level cam. Also, pros know how to use it properly. I used to work in a group that used a DVX100, and I saw how the Image could be good. But they didnt have any idea how or what the settings were. The white balance was always off, and frankly we had no reference by which to set it. If you want it to look pro, expect to invest in some white balance cards, color charts, filters etc. Even if youre using a consumer level cam, this is a good idea. Basically berween the Optura and the GS250, I say go with the GS250. 3 CCDs is something you definiately want. Under 1000 dollars you wont find too many 3 chip cams, and they definitely do increase resolution and overall quality. Although if you want the 16:9, expect to either invest in a cam that has a wide CCD or an anamorphic converter. |
Ok. Yes, it is a prosumer camera. However, in addition to the unknown number of TV segments or shows shot with the DVX100A there are also some feature films that have been shot with it. One of them featured Courtney Cox. I think it was a Sundance entry.
You are right. When you have the greenlight to use someone else's $$, (like a studio) the quality immediately jumps to true pro gear. But if I had $2000 - $3500 to budget for a camera and wanted a film look on a project I wanted to get commercially distributed in theaters, on TV, or for the rental market a good cinematographer, lighting director and a DVX100A would be my first priorities.
loki74, do you (or does anyone else here) have any experience with the Sony DSR-250?
How would you rate it compared to the Canon GL-2, XL-2 or the Panasonic AG-DVX100A or even the DVC7?