Quote:
Originally Posted by mduell
Please tell me that scrolling and moving windows is not a serious performance challenge for hardware that was new about 5 years ago.
Look …
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Scrolling and moving windows is slick. Redrawing and minimizing is seriously fubared in X though, my X800 barely does it will.
It works…
Hi,
Just an update to everyone who helped me...
I received the radeon 8500 and hard drive enclosure today. Both work great!! I'm not sure what to look for in terms of the perfo…
Hi everybody... I'm new here.
I don't speak english very good....i need a cd key to can play COD on internet whit my imac..
Does anyone have a cd key.. i;ve try whit the cd key …
NO! How did you beat me, by 1 minute. You weren't there when my page updated!
EDIT: That's because you didn't! Ha! I beat you by one minute but I made an edit so it looks like …
$100 cheaper if you're willing to take 2x512 MB.
I'm surprised that Apple isn't advertising a $100 lower price.
P.S. 7200 rpm 100 GB is the same price as 120 GB 5400 rpm.
the pricing is little wrong... 15" 2.16 MBP has the same price as the 17" , while 17" gives bigger screen, bigger HDD, faster super drive, firewire 800 and one extra USB
what's go…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyl
the pricing is little wrong... 15" 2.16 MBP has the same price as the 17" , while 17" gives bigger screen, bigger HDD, faster super drive, firewi…
There is one thing I don't like (if one can say such thing about such computer) but having had a 17 inches in the past, the fact that the slot loadind drive is placed just below th…
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajprice
Spec up a 15" to 2.16GHz and a 120Gb hard drive and its more expensive than the 17"!!
17" - £1999
15" upgraded - £2059
Quoting myself,…
Well, since it looks like this'll be the thread: They added a USB port. That was nice of 'em.
If I wanted to carry around something that big, I'd be all over this thing, but I'm s…
It all makes sense now...most people would opt for the 15" over the 17" in the past due to it being...well, basically a 17" as far as specs go with a smaller screen. Right now, I'd…
what is the point of the 17" really?
isn't the 15.4" screen the same resolution? 1440x900?
unless the resolution is boosted, i don't see a need for it...
just add FW800 to the 1…