We have a Marketplace forum for selling stuff. This belongs there if anywhere.

I know someone that just bought an iPod nano and I thought that it'd be nice to get them a stereo system to play it in. Recently, I went to a Bose store to purchase a Bose Digi…

I do not own one, but have seen one in action. I personally would go with the Hi-Fi, I found it had deeper sound then the Boss system. And from my history of Boss, Boss Blows...

The only thing, how much does your boss system cost? I think the ipod hi-fi is about $350 which is more expensive than my ipod!

The Bose is more expensive than the Apple and is total crap in comparison.

O, Bose, I thought he said Boss or something, Bose is a ripoff, and it doesn't even sound good.

He linked to the Bose, if you bothered to look.

O sorry, I didn't bother to look.

Oh. But you're making about a hundred posts a day! I wonder why you don't get around to actually READING the threads you reply to - like, all of the threads?

Yea ha haha

Quote: The Bose is more expensive than the Apple and is total crap in comparison. So I'm assuming you've heard both? How was the Bose, "total crap in compari…

I work at a store that sells both, and we've had plenty of opportunity to compare (seeing as they're sitting right next to each other). The SoundDock literally sounds like a cardb…

I work at a store that sells both, and we've had plenty of opportunity to compare (seeing as they're sitting right next to each other). The SoundDock literally sounds like a cardb…

That is a great idea. Buy your stereo equipment based on looks alone. I never thought of that. I wonder why I never thought of that? Oh yeah BECAUSE IT'S ABOUT THE STUPIDEST THI…

Quote: That is a great idea. Buy your stereo equipment based on looks alone. I never thought of that. I wonder why I never thought of that? Mac addicts used …

Quote: Originally Posted by BCPhoto Mac addicts used to buy their computer equipment based on looks. Not a big deal, and stereo equipment has never been Apple's forte anyways. …

The thread is pretty self-explanatory but I'll give my reasoning. Before we got a working solution to running XP on our Intel Macs (by working I mean graphics accelerated), I neve…

Yea, buying slower games with later release dates is soooo attractive.

I still think that the number of people who will actually be dual-booting their Macs on a regular basis is somewhat limit. Sure, the kind of people who post to tech message boards …

If/when I get an Intel Mac.... I'd buy and support hybrid releases (like Blizzard's), but no, I wouldn't wait 6-9 months to purchase pricier, slower-running Mac ports if I had an …

I'd consider running a near-real speed virtual PC to do games, but wouldn't bother flipping systems back and forth just to play games, IMO.

I'm not a hard core gamer. I don't mind waiting, and frankly I don't mind paying $10 more for a quality port. Doom 3, Myst 5, Halo were all worth the wait. Crappy ports (do you …

I said this once, I said I'd be going to hell for suggesting this but... If people are going to pull this stunt, it'd be best to pirate the PC version and then buy the Mac version…

I'm all for supporting Mac development when possible, but why reward people for making a bad port?

I think when Mac porting houses only port to Intel Macs, they will be a faster process.