I'm going to need a raw organizer very soon and I was thinking about Bibble Pro. I was wondering, how fast is it. Can anyone give me their experience/predictions. Also, if anyone h…

How are you planning to use the application you purchase?

Quote: Originally Posted by art_director How are you planning to use the application you purchase? I plan on shooting almost exclusivly in raw and will be leaving the good …

What do you consider to be too excessive about it? I'm not arguing, I just haven't heard that position on Photohop before. I'm also curious to know what your creative projects mi…

By excessive I mean it is not geared towards photo organizing. Since that is my main concern I want the tools that allow me to do just that, plus a few extra features like the one…

Being a pro user I'm not acquainted with any applications specifically geared at organizing photos. Given the narrow scope of features you want I'd think you'd be hard-pressed to f…

Right, suffice it to say that Bibble, Aperature, and many other RAW workflow programs satisfy enough of my requirements. That is, all but one that I'm unsure of. Going back to the …

Have you looked into the Gimp?

It's not just speed but also quality. Bibble is quick and easy to see what is going on. The controls are nice and obvious to use and very good. I haven't seen version 4.6 (that cam…

You and your brother should call your company, Doran Doran.

i noticed this happening on both of my computers, everytime i log off and back in, shapeshifter/silk doesnt apply my theme properly... finder bar up top is default aqua, while ever…

Up on O'Grady's PowerPage. http://www.powerpage.org/archives/20...ks.html#008640

What's 'vicLib FFT'?

I think you mean "veclib". As far as I remember it is a test of Altivec performance. Of course the MacBook is going to bomb on this test seeing as it does not have Altivec in har…

It's great to have early benchmarks, but Xbench isn't exactly the best for the purpose. Also, the %increase column is just plain old wrong, or at least misleading. There are nume…

Keep in mind that of his two comparison laptops, the PowerBook had 2 gigs of RAM, the MBP only 1 gig. Even out the RAM and results would have been even more one-sided. Of course, t…

Quote: Originally Posted by cambro It's great to have early benchmarks, but Xbench isn't exactly the best for the purpose. Also, the %increase column is just plain old wrong, o…

Can anyone post scores from the latest universal version of Cinebench 9.5?

Will do. Downloading Cinebench 9.5 now

Fairly new to the program, so let me know if I'm doing something wrong with it. Here's the output it gave me when I ran "all tests" CINEBENCH 9.5 ********************************…

563 is pretty darn good. Here are some desktop dual core CPU scores to compare with in the PC World: Athlon FX-60 (2.8GHz): 692 Intel Pentium 955 EE (3.46GHz): 666 Athlon64 X2-480…

Quote: Originally Posted by Troll I don't think it's plain wrong but maybe a little misleading when it says % increase. That column is comparing the two machines. 100% would mea…

Quote: Originally Posted by Abbas 563 is pretty darn good. Here are some desktop dual core CPU scores to compare with in the PC World: Athlon FX-60 (2.8GHz): 692 Intel Pentium …

Quote: Originally Posted by JKT you simply can't have anything higher than 100%. Umm... Going from 10 to 15 is an increase of 50% going from 10 to 20 is an increase of 100%…

Those benchmarks are "retarded" I don't care who tells you, their is NOTHING that has been optimized to properly test the intel processors compared to the g4, even apps that were p…