Quote:
Originally Posted by Icruise
B) There's a huge difference in quality between what you get on a DVD and what the iTMS is selling.
C) It's actually more expensive to buy v…
I baught my first video off iTMS the other day, Pixar's Boundin. I dont have a video iPod....yet. but i did hook up my Powerbook to my TV, and played back the video.....and WOW. fo…
The amazing thing about the iPod is that it actually allows for higher resolutions than 320x240.
-Where is this information found?
You can obtain very nice 480P like resolution…
No offense, but I'm having trouble figuring out what you're quoting and what you're asking. But in any case, can you explain what settings you are using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icruise
No offense, but I'm having trouble figuring out what you're quoting and what you're asking. But in any case, can you explain what settings yo…
For h.264 it must be the baseline profile and 320x240. The bitrate must be below 768kbps (although around 400 is the max you should really use).
For MPEG-4 keep the total number o…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icruise
For h.264 it must be the baseline profile and 320x240. The bitrate must be below 768kbps (although around 400 is the max you should really us…
Try a few tests and see what you think is the best balance between file size and quality. Or if you don't care about file size, set it to 1500 or 2000.
I encode movies to a medium setting of 1500kbps, maximum pixels - see formula above. I deinterlace everything, it saves some space. I also go for a two pass encode, it makes for su…
I edit and broadcast over cable a weekly Bible study from our Church. When I first got there and started doing them I would edit in FCP and output to miniDV tapes for broadcast. Th…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icruise
For h.264 it must be the baseline profile and 320x240. The bitrate must be below 768kbps (although around 400 is the max you should really us…
I've done some experimenting with different h.264 bitrates and it didn't seem like anything over 400 made a huge difference in quality. If you have plenty of free space, by all mea…
I use Handbrake/QuickTimePro, Subtitler-D, TitleLab...to do DVD to dual subtitled iPod videos.
I was using ffmpegx at first.
I've also used DVDx 2.3 on the pc side of things, alo…
Appleinsider says so:
http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1368
So, should I wait for it or buy the G5 20" iMac next week?
I expect I'll be buying the G5 for a couple of r…
It doesn't make sense to me. By January, there will be very little to no native software for such a machine (well, apart OS X and some Apple software). If I was in the market for a…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
Well if you don't really need a new machine now I would wait till MWSF if I were you. It's only 2 months away.
Trouble is, I DO need …
Then buy it now. The iMacs were just improved, with tangable upgrades to the processor and video systems. If your evaluations of the existing system meet your needs, then go for …
I think all the G4 products will switch before any of the G5 products do.
I think Apple will have all their software running natively when the associated hardware is released. In …
Quote:
Originally Posted by mduell
Games in an emulator may not be so bad, espically if you're coming from an older Mac. Microsoft has the Xbox 360 ready to play 200+ Xbox games…
The iMac makes perfect sense to be the first intel based Mac. It's their high profile consumer machine. The Powerbook would be next I would think because it needs the speed. T…
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathew_m
The iMac makes perfect sense to be the first intel based Mac. It's their high profile consumer machine.
It does not make sense to swit…
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ancient One
Trouble is, I DO need a new machine now.
Why are you even asking then? If you need it now just buy the best machine for the mon…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre B.
It does not make sense to switch a G5 machine now. Intel has not yet consumer level 64-bit CPUs and using a 32-bit one, would be a step bac…