Skip to main content
Search titles, bodies, and author names
Found 1,727 posts across 2 forums.

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #11

In spite of what I said above, I do think that if a programmer ceases support of a product they should either make an unprotected full version available for distribution or else co…
68kMLA Development by Quadraman Fri, 13 Jun 2008 - 14:39

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #9

I have noticed very little "free" software for my newtons, most of it is shareware. Click to expand... How much software have you written and distributed for free? Click to …
68kMLA Development by Bunsen Fri, 13 Jun 2008 - 13:08

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #8

This is a subject that has been picking at me for some time. I have noticed very little "free" software for my newtons, most of it is shareware. What is worse is the limitations th…
68kMLA Development by Quadraman Thu, 12 Jun 2008 - 09:16

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #7

I have noticed very little "free" software for my newtons, most of it is shareware. Click to expand... How much software have you written and distributed for free?
68kMLA Development by porter Wed, 11 Jun 2008 - 22:45

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #6

They walk a very fine line in the current state as well. They need to prevent piracy and create funds to continue such niche software. But the moment they go under or are not utili…
68kMLA Development by Da Penguin Wed, 11 Jun 2008 - 05:56

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #5

Personally you can either track down the original developer through the internet and get the software registered, or just pirate it. I don't think developers are greedy pigs, if t…
68kMLA Development by Unknown_K Tue, 10 Jun 2008 - 06:17

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #3

That isn't a problem limited to the Newton. The Amiga shares it. MS-DOS shares it. In a sense, I would argue that our sense of entitlement is a form of greed. Though, on the wh…
68kMLA Development by II2II Tue, 10 Jun 2008 - 03:52

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #2

Anyone have any thoughts or suggestions? Click to expand... ... and so began the quest of Richard Stahlman for free software. I doubt if many of those newton developers still …
68kMLA Development by porter Tue, 10 Jun 2008 - 03:32

Why are newton developers such greedy pigs? — #1

This is a subject that has been picking at me for some time. I have noticed very little "free" software for my newtons, most of it is shareware. What is worse is the limitations th…
68kMLA Development by iamdigitalman Tue, 10 Jun 2008 - 02:34

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #41

This thread isn't going anywhere... it's pretty much dead. I was proved incorrect... now isn't there a different thread for ShapeShifter benchmarks?
MacNN Development by TheSpaz Thu, 6 Oct 2005 - 17:38

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #40

on my current machine there is no noticable lag whatsoever. on my previous one (G4800 / 640) the lag when launching an app was noticable.
MacNN Development by Ji Eun Thu, 6 Oct 2005 - 10:33

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #39

Quote: Originally Posted by goMac You could maybe do something with fs_usage, I'm not sure. Without making a parser for that it would be a horribly long process to find…
MacNN Development by Tick Wed, 5 Oct 2005 - 15:45

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #38

Quote: Originally Posted by Tick Does anyone have any substantial proof as to what gomac or Rosyna are saying? Statistics on resource usage while shape shifter/other unsanity pr…
MacNN Development by goMac Wed, 5 Oct 2005 - 14:49

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #37

The bickering between the unsanity crowd and gomac continues to make me giggle, but I will digress. Does anyone have any substantial proof as to what gomac or Rosyna are saying? S…
MacNN Development by Tick Wed, 5 Oct 2005 - 14:25

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #36

Quote: Originally Posted by Rosyna goMac, do *not* assume to know how SS is doing it. You know what they say about people that assume things. If you're looking in a list o…
MacNN Development by goMac Wed, 5 Oct 2005 - 11:17

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #34

in my use, shapeshifter/mightymouse/fruitmenu...slow down my mac...a bit. if i run a test user account without ape, things are a little faster. still...not worth giving them up! i…
MacNN Development by fisherKing Wed, 5 Oct 2005 - 11:00

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #33

Quote: Originally Posted by Rosyna btw, Shapeshifter's open doodad is constant time. No O business at all. If you're reading a plist to find a match for a file you no long…
MacNN Development by goMac Wed, 5 Oct 2005 - 10:46

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #31

Quote: Originally Posted by Kevin It's a speed hit I can notice considerably. The same with Kaleidoscope back in the day. Are you sure that's what you're noticing? When wa…
MacNN Development by Rosyna Wed, 5 Oct 2005 - 06:35

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #29

Quote: Originally Posted by nooon Does this apply for all APEs or just Shapeshifter? It depends entirely on how the author wrote that APE module.
MacNN Development by goMac Tue, 4 Oct 2005 - 23:04

ShapeShifter DOES Modify System Files! — #28

Quote: Originally Posted by Blacktiger Actually, if you want to be technical. From a computer science standpoint, doubling and tripleing are merely big-omega(2 or 3)... and sinc…
MacNN Development by goMac Tue, 4 Oct 2005 - 23:02
mp.ls