General DTK question: has anybody looked at operating systems other than Mac OS X on them? Windows 7, 8.1U1 or 10TP would probably do really well on this thing, especially if the P…

As mentioned above, the first board is a Rev 7 RFI motherboard used in the Apple II+.  The second board looks like an earlier Rev 4 motherboard that was probably used in an Apple I…

In re piracy links: Please don't. especially Mac OS X itself and OS X-era software. All of that stuff is stuff you know is actively being developed, and most of it's still activel…

Your best bet truly is to image the drive that came with it (unless you also got whatever installation media Apple shipped with it) and then put a new drive in to install some othe…

I deffinatley have a copy of that around (i'm not going to post a link here as per the rules though)

Thanks haplain! It's supposed to be build 8F1111. It was once very popular, but like almost every torrent I know, it died many years ago. Back then, I don't think people saw the hi…

I'm fairly confident that I have the correct version of 10.4.3 for Intel on my NAS LaCie... I'll report back.

Like Bear said, the top is an Apple II+ board, the bottom is an Apple II. The boards are nearly identical, it is the ROM and the date tag that tell you but its a late model Apple I…

Sherry Haibara said: Unfortunately, 10.4.1 is extremely finicky regarding the supported hardware: the Intel GMA900 and GMA950 chips are effectively the only GPUs supported wi…

markyb86 said: Are you trying PC graphics cards or Mac? Click to expand... I have tested with classic PC card (old and new) and graphic card from Mac Pro (who works on PC…

The first one is a II+ board. The bottom one has the characteristics of a II board, but some went into II+es so without seeing more details I don't think anybody can say that it de…

Unfortunately, 10.4.1 is extremely finicky regarding the supported hardware: the Intel GMA900 and GMA950 chips are effectively the only GPUs supported with graphics acceleration.  …

Hi guys I was hoping someone could help ID a few motherboards, these are two separate boards I am looking at and I want to make sure they are Apple II and not Apple II+ motherboar…

I honestly believe that running old macs with bad caps can lead to permanent damage. I could very well be wrong, but why take the risk?

Or just throw it out the window...

Likely the firmware and OS X doesn't support the GPU. Just give up on upgrades. Nothing will be supported, it'll reduce the value of being original, and these weren't meant to be …

The machine could have one of those gimped PCIe slots that only take SVDO ADD2 cards. Otherwise being BIOS based it should take standard PC video cards.

Are you trying PC graphics cards or Mac?

yah sometimes the sad mac codes can send you on a wild goose chase.  is best to just replace it all.

It was for both of them However it was aimed as a "if replacing all the ram fails" solution yes there are 2, iirc they are the two chips immediately to the right of the CPU (as…

I wouldn't attempt any upgrades to it besides possibly a SCSI card and maxing the ram out. It would however be nice if you could dump the BIOS and store it somewhere for safekeepi…

I second what uni said, be assured after decades these caps are going bad, even the best caps will dry out and not do the job.

Hi,  Many news : i can't boot on a USB drive (no option on the BIOS) and can't use a real graphic card : i have tested with many GPU and i have no screen. Just photos.

I think maxes suggestion was more for Macdrone not really for The thread op

Just tossing this out there, I'd say that I have re-Ram'd at least 14 128k's. and every single one of them had artifacts on the screen and A sad Mac. and every single one of them, …