Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Bonte
Its just now with the recent court rulings on MS that Apple and the clones can take this step, expect a Mactel that runs Windows just fin…
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainHaddock
Windows does not co-exist "just fine", even in your situation. The only way to do what you've done is to install Windows first, repart…
Quote:
Originally Posted by volcano
Those $100 laptops will be running Linux.
Yes, but Apple did offer osX for free. In other words, a license for a Mac clone!
Quote:
…
Quote:
Originally Posted by mduell
Can't destroy something that doesn't exist.
Right, talk about killing it while still in its mama's belly. Apple makes an enormous effort …
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Bonte
Mactel isn't here to replace Windows XP, its not fighting with XP. It has to coexist as good as possible so people see osX as the success…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Bonte
Only if Hell freezes and pigs can fly?
Remember what Apple's front page looked like on the day they released iTunes for Windows?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre B.
Run them both on the same computer and they will compete. It is inevitable. And guess what developers will do once they find out that the u…
Quote:
Originally Posted by saoxcore
and how do i delete photos from my ipod?
You delete them from iPhoto (if you have your preferences set to load the entire iPhoto lib…
I don't have an iPod yet, so I don't know how iTunes handles them. But I have all my music backed up at 320Kbps MP3, so the average file size is about 10mb a song. Does iTunes al…
One more thing. iTunes will allow me to put MP3's on an iPod right? I use MP3 because I can take it anywhere, I don't want to rerip 300 albums in AAC just to use an iPod.
The iPod plays MP3's, AIFF, WAV, Apple Lossless, AAC, Protected AAC, and MPEG4 & H.264 video (5th Generation Only).
I don't believe you can lower the bitrate for transfer to y…
iTunes can re-encode to a lower bitrate on the fly if you have an iPod Shuffle, which leaves only one copy of each song on your computer. Otherwise, you can re-encode the music to …
It bugs me that some people seem to have this impression that AAC is some bizarre non-standard iPod-only codec and therefore continue to use MP3s at ridiculously high bitrates to k…
AAC is, however, not supported on many platforms, much like Sony's proprietary ATRAC3 system. Not that there is any problem with AAC, particularly if all of your hardware is Mac, …
Quote:
Originally Posted by siMac
There is absolutely no difference between burning a CD/re-encoding and simply converting directly from AAC to MP3. Save yourself the blank CDs.…
Indeed. My bad.
Still, so long as people insist on using old technology, new technology will be slow to be widely supported. It's kind of a chicken/egg thing - many people won't …
AAC-128 is for the proverbial birds. The sound quality is definitely lower than CD-quality. Can you hear it when you're walking around with your iPod? Probably not. But if you'…
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
I never do less than AAC 160. Go get a decent set of headphones (not earbuds), and play a CD and then the AAC-128 track. Listen c…
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
I can't understand how files on a burned CD can substitute for an album in your hands.
I concur. That is why I never buy…