Quote:
Originally Posted by Brass
If you compile as universal binary, you must use the 10.4u SDK. This makes it incompatible with anything less than 10.4. So "no", it will not…
Quote:
Originally Posted by saddino
Yes, there is a way.
As you note, the SDK will affect what APIs are availble to your code, but unless you are using "fully deprecated" APIs …
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby
Question: If I can compile for 10.3, and everything I use also works & compiles in the 10.2 SDK (it's a very small screensaver), can I set…
I'm glad I posted this thread, because I quickly discovered I wasn't even compiling Universal Binary to begin with. And My saver was never compiled for 10.2... The URL above help…
Okay guys, this prediction sounds pretty wacky, but work with me here:
1. Go to apple.com/macosx/;
2. Take a look at the page and think about what the headline implies.
If you'r…
The tag line may mean NOTHING, but then again.......
A few years ago, at Macworld Keynote, Steve made the comment that "Once the transition to OS X is complete, we will have optio…
Wrong assumption. I believed all along that Apple was developing OS X for Intel. And I know I'm not the only person who suspected it. It was definitely not "nobody".
tooki
I think your reading too much of what isn't there.
As for OSX being developed on the intel all along makes sense to. I recall reading a story that apple was ready to jump over to …
I agree with everyone else that you're probably just reading into it. Especially when you read articles like this...
Apple doesn't need to let OS X run on generic Intel machines t…
The website's not a good measure of such things. Apple can change their website to whatever they want in a blink of an eye. If this were some sort of hard-published document they w…
I think the language is just designed to ease people coming from the Windows world into the concept of buying into a computer that requires a new operating system. So they'll read …
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Bent My Wookiee
"PowerPC-based machines"
Isn't that because Xserves aren't "Macs"?
I think anything that runs Mac OS X is a Mac. Or are iBook…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Mac
he knows where I'm going with this line of thought.
Someplace where actual evidence is unnecessary in order to believe an idea?
If Apple…
maybe you are just reading it between the lines...it doesnt mean that when it says intel its refering to intel machines it still talks about intels in Mac...sometimes we just empha…