This thread is pretty interesting with all the different views, but what difference in real life (and in ordinary English, not tech-speak please) will a 7448 make compared to the e…

Quote: Originally Posted by hallvard This thread is pretty interesting with all the different views, but what difference in real life (and in ordinary English, not tech-speak pl…

The speed increase from the 1MB L2 cache and 200 FSB alone would make the 7448 a welcome update.

The speed increase from the 1MB L2 cache and 200 FSB alone would make the 7448 a welcome update.

The speed increase from the 1MB L2 cache and 200 FSB alone would make the 7448 a welcome update.

Has anyone developed a preset for Sorenson Squeeze that will produce a movie playable on the iPod video?? Thanks! Frank

The iPod cannot play the sorenson codec. H.264 and MP4 only.

Sorenson exports direct to MP4 and this is the first I have heard of it not being compatible...what is the problem..the program itself? The presets? Thanks for the info...

Sorenson can be converted into mp4 and H.264. Any QT supported codec can. Just export into an iPod compatible format and you're on. But sorenson will not play on an iPod.

He's not talking about the sorenson codecs, he's talking about the "Sorenson Squeeze" software. That software can output mpeg-4. He's asking for the mp4 setting that will be playab…

^^ understood. Thanks for making it clear.

Exactly...Sorenson Squeeze does indeed output mp4 and I'm trying to use it to produce iTunes vids..just wondering if anyone has used it and what the output settings would be...

K, so i played with Sorenson a bit tonight and I have these settings (whihc looks pretty good on the iPod): Stream Type: Non-Streaming (Non-Hinted) Audio: Codec: Coding Technolog…

1600 is really overkill for 320 x 240 resolution. You could probably go as low as 400 and not see a significant difference, although I would advise you to do some testing to see wh…

and 48k sample rate is too high for audio. Make that 44.1k. You won't hear the difference at all.

I am not talking about making the Finder non-brushed metal. Or nicer folder icons. Beyond all traditional stuff. I am talking about a whole new way to get around your computer. V…

I don't think much will change in terms of the Finder's UI in v10.5 at all.

I think iTunes will replace every app, including the Finder.

Well, I love Looking Glass's use of 3D as a way to minimize or windowshade applications, but that's really beside the point. Frankly, I just want the OS 9 Finder re-coded in Cocoa…

Quote: Originally Posted by tooki I do not in the slightest agree that Spotlight negates the need for a Findertooki In its current form, no. It is slow and the results ar…

Quote: Originally Posted by Severed Hand of Skywalker In its current form, no. It is slow and the results are displayed well. I DO think it can take over for 80% or rummaging.…

Quote: Originally Posted by tooki Well, I love Looking Glass's use of 3D as a way to minimize or windowshade applications, but that's really beside the point. Frankly, I just w…

are the people who are complaining or can't fathom the idea that windows can sit on top of their icons, windows users or ex-windows users? i find that windows users don't work wel…

Quote: Originally Posted by mdc are the people who are complaining or can't fathom the idea that windows can sit on top of their icons, windows users or ex-windows users? i fin…

I think Apple may be frightened of the hue and cry that would come from us, its core user base, if it deviated from the current Finder paradigm. It has been fairly apparent that, o…