C++ or Objective-C? — #12
Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty825
I personally disagree with Brass' statement that Obj-C syntax is far simpler than C++. IMHO, C++ more closely follows the C language behav…
Found 6,313 posts across 1 forum.
C++ or Objective-C? — #13
Objective-C has more than one syntactic extension to C. It adds keywords such as @implementation…@end and @try, and the <ProtocolName> syntax for indicating conformance to a …
C++ or Objective-C? — #14
Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty825
Good luck making your decision. Like everyone, I agree that you should try and learn C first (or use the Cocoa bindings from a language li…
C++ or Objective-C? — #15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
I will defiantly be writing Mac software 99.9% of the time, but if I want to write a Windows (or Linux) program, does a Obj-C compile…
C++ or Objective-C? — #16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
I will defiantly be writing Mac software 99.9% of the time, but if I want to write a Windows (or Linux) program, does a Obj-C compile…
C++ or Objective-C? — #17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckit
You don't think anything has been written in C89 since 1995? What do you reckon all the C programmers were using in 1996?
Whoops...I mis…
C++ or Objective-C? — #18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckit
They do, but it would likely be a lot more than a simple recompile —�but that's true of porting a C++ Mac program as well.
The only project…
C++ or Objective-C? — #19
Carbon and Cocoa are very different. It's not that one is necessarily less capable than the other, they're just different. To generalize a lot, I would say Cocoa is "easier." Carbo…
C++ or Objective-C? — #20
I think that Apple originally inteded Carbon to be a "transition" technology from Classic Mac OS to Mac OS X. However, this is certainly not the case now. It is not the poor cous…
C++ or Objective-C? — #21
If you're writing new code, then cocoa is probably the best way to go since you're starting fresh. Carbon does have it's applications though and certainly could be used. IMO, car…
C++ or Objective-C? — #22
Cocoa is meant for Objective-C, but you can use other languages with it. Java, Perl, Python, Ruby and probably several others I haven't thought of all have Cocoa bridges.
C++ or Objective-C? — #23
Note that the Java bridge is deprecated, though.
C++ or Objective-C? — #24
I thought the bridging technology was deprecated (Bridgette or whatever it was called), but Cocoa-Java was still alive. Did they deprecate the whole thing?
C++ or Objective-C? — #25
They've said that no future API will be added to Cocoa-Java, but existing ones will continue to work.
C++ or Objective-C? — #26
Definitely go with Cocoa/Objective-C. You can find plenty of information on how to do so in the archives.
C++ is a terrible language. Never learn it if you can help it.
C++ or Objective-C? — #27
Quote:
Originally Posted by parallax
Definitely go with Cocoa/Objective-C. You can find plenty of information on how to do so in the archives.
C++ is a terrible language. Never…
C++ or Objective-C? — #28
Go to http://cocoadevcentral.com and read C tutorial. It gives you enough C to move on to ObjC. Whatever language you choose to learn, just remember that the languages aren't tha…
C++ or Objective-C? — #29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceman Spiff
I've started on C, and I plan to go onto Cocoa/Objective-C, but what makes C++ a terrible language?
C++ is a strongly typed langu…
C++ or Objective-C? — #30
In short, C++ is a hack of an object-oriented system. There are places where it's just broken (search the web for details). Debugging errors with templates is a nightmare.
MacG33k…
C++ or Objective-C? — #31
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacG33k
Go to http://cocoadevcentral.com and read C tutorial. It gives you enough C to move on to ObjC. Whatever language you choose to learn, just…
[Seti] 9K RAC 1.8M TC Athlon? — #1
just wanted to look how well E.T.'s Quad is doing, I noticed this ..
does anyone know about that? display bug? new super computer? and who are those on position 2 and 3?
EDIT: …
[Seti] 9K RAC 1.8M TC Athlon? — #2
That's odd.
No way a Pentium D or an Athlon 64 X2 rig would beat a G5 Quad in SETI, let alone by that large of a margin. I was thinking that maybe they were MP systems. But then …
[Seti] 9K RAC 1.8M TC Athlon? — #3
sure, I guess a merging error.
as I and others mentioned on the Planet3dNow forum (they should know ), the first computer has no results to click on, was created today, but has 1…
[Seti] 9K RAC 1.8M TC Athlon? — #4
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiloProbst
sure, I guess a merging error.
as I and others mentioned on the Planet3dNow forum (they should know ), the first computer has no results…
[Seti] 9K RAC 1.8M TC Athlon? — #5
Looks like a bug in the merge function:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum...d.php?id=28141