I have assembed some info on power utilization and die sizes on the various G4 and G5 chips out there, in this post.
Some relevant points about an iMac G5 and a PowerBook G5 inclu…
Quote:
Oh do I wish it were so... but did you see the fans on the thing?!
Servers are supposed to have heavy duty fans, high power, fast fans that move a ton …
Quote:
Originally posted by Eug:
If this low power 1.6 GHz number is true, then it would be perfect for both an iMac G5 and PowerBook G5 refresh, at around 1.2 GHz for …
Quote:
Originally posted by Pierre B.:
The reason is that even a 1.6 GHz @ 90 nm G5, can barely be used in a Powerbook, according to current evidence.
Would you ple…
Quote:
Originally posted by Pierre B.:
I still find hard to believe that Apple will use the current (90 nm) G5 in the Powerbooks. The reason is that even a 1.6 GHz @ 90 …
Quote:
Originally posted by issa:
Would you please share this "evidence" with the rest of us? Links to power specifications, etc. would be most appreciated. (I can't see…
Pierre B.,
Thanks, anyway. The math and extrapolations are all well and understandable; but I was hoping to see actual manufacturer's specs to draw my own conclusions. Can't help …
Quote:
Originally posted by issa:
Can't help but feel there may be more involved here.
Of course there are more parameters involved and we know nothing about these…
Quote:
Originally posted by Pierre B.:
Eug has summarised most if not all of the publicly available specifications. With a G5 130 nm 1.8 GHz running at 47 W, and the 1.2…
The sad part for the state of PowerBooks is the fact that my 2002 TiBook still has 4/5ths the CPU speed of the 2004 AluBook. The G5 PowerBook needs to appear as soon as possible.
Getting in late in this discussion, so let's just jump in:
Since the introduction of the G5, I've been fantasizing about the laptop version. Yum! But Apple has lots of hurdles ahe…
Quote:
Originally posted by mchang:
Getting in late in this discussion, so let's just jump in:
Since the introduction of the G5, I've been fantasizing about the laptop …
The 1W number is their target average consumption. That is definitely a marketing number. Even at 2x or 3x that number, though, 3W is pretty miserly.
Intel has designed a mobile, …
Quote:
Originally posted by mchang:
Intel has designed a mobile, power-friendly processor from basically the ground up, so IBM and Apple will have to compete with that, …
With the introduction of the 90nm G5s the propect of G5 Powerbooks is a lot more realistic than it was just two months ago. Even without in-chip clock steppings the chipset can aut…
Quote:
Originally posted by mchang:
I thought I read that IBM wouldn't be delivering the 90nm G5 until the fall at earliest. Probably won't be seeing 3GHz in the 130nm. …
Quote:
Originally posted by mchang:
The 1W number is their target average consumption. That is definitely a marketing number. Even at 2x or 3x that number, though, 3W is…
Quote:
Originally posted by Eug:
Yes, the Pentium M is an excellent chip, and I believe that the G5 90 nm laptop CPUs won't be quite as power efficient. However, I do no…
Quote:
Originally posted by Pierre B.:
How do you think such a G5@1.5 GHz would compare against a Pentium M at, say, 1.6 GHz? I mean calculation power, not power consump…
Quote:
Originally posted by Eug:
I dunno. I'd just be guessing, but I'd say it'd be in the same ballpark, with the edge going to the Pentium M 1.6 on average.
Of c…
Quote:
Originally posted by Pierre B.:
Of course there is the test software issue, so anyway things would not be clear. However, do you know how the Pentium M compares t…
Quote:
I fully believe that IBM has a 1.5+ GHz chip in the works that has a maximum wattage in the ballpark of 25 Watts.
Yes, but I'm not so sure its the .09u …
Quote:
Originally posted by cowerd:
Yes, but I'm not so sure its the .09u 970 thats in the Xserve.
The footprint seems a little small for a CPU--like it was missing som…