Look on ebay.

Yes, I'm pretty sure that the earphones included with the wired remote for the full size iPods and the old minis are the same as the ones originally shipped with the iPod.

thanks iMacfan, thats the answer I was looking for any other confermations though would be great

Nano I can't believe it. I've been denying it for a while, but it's true ! APPLE now = MICROSOFT! In another ploy to ensure ipod users only use their software (iTunes) they rende…

http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProdu...duct_Id=158350 thanks for playing

Quote: Originally Posted by Weezer http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProdu...duct_Id=158350 thanks for playing Thanks for playing What ? http://playlistmag.com/reviews/2005…

didn't know that

Quote: Originally Posted by Weezer didn't know that In hindesight I shoulda just posted that article to begin with. I woulda made the same assumption, and in fact did, you…

Needless restrictions? The Nano is FULL of components already. Where would they put the extra hardware that the Camera Connector needs? It's NOT a needless restriction, it's a d…

Quote: Originally Posted by ghporter Needless restrictions? The Nano is FULL of components already. Where would they put the extra hardware that the Camera Connector needs? I…

4 gigs isn't really enough to want to store your pics on anyway. I mean you can get memory cards that big.

The nano doesn't support USB host. It's not a needless restriction. It's the chipset they've used. Probably to save space.

Quote: Originally Posted by torifile The nano doesn't support USB host. It's not a needless restriction. It's the chipset they've used. Probably to save space. BS. It was a…

all music players are becoming more and more proprietary. most other competiting mp3 players have such restrictions in place and its not something totally outrageous either. when y…

Quote: Originally Posted by trip BS. It was a business decision. A business decision to make the thing as small as it is. Features take up space-it takes hardware to do anyt…

Quote: Originally Posted by trip BS. It was a business decision. Yeah! Let's leave features out so people buy MORE of them! WTH kind of business decision was that if it wou…

double post.

I don't think the Nano was targeted at photographers as much as they would like to think. The Nano was attempt to recreate the success of the iPod Mini and hopefully the sales. Th…

Differentiated product line. It's the same reason you can't get a 12" Powerbook with Firewire 800.

SpaceMonkey is right. The nano targets a different consumer than the full-sized iPod. The full-sized iPods are targeted for users who want access to features such as camera downlo…

Not to mention, if they enabled photo dump functionality, the first thing you'd complain about would be "dang battery is too short lived" or "why did they only make it 4GB?" or "th…

Quote: Originally Posted by torifile Yeah! Let's leave features out so people buy MORE of them! WTH kind of business decision was that if it wouldn't make some sort of differenc…

Quote: Originally Posted by reemas are you joking? in the tech industry this happens very often. most recently a 100 song cap on the ROKR. Read my post again: it would make…

What business decision? What does Apple stand to profit by arbitrarily restricting the functionality of the Nano? Your argument is specious. The logical conclusion is that the…

With the size of the screen and the amount of space, I elected not to have photos on my 4GB Nano, preferring to leave that to the 60GB iPod where I can hook it up to a TV for slide…