Well, I may have to ask those of you with machines running 10.3.9 and earlier to be a little more patient. Rick has been looking at the build system, and it looks like it may be ea…

Hi all, OK. I am running Tiger (osx 10.4.2) on a G5 dual 2.0 ghz with 2.5 gig ddr sdram. BOINC Manager gui v 4.43. The new compile has settled down and seems to be running fine n…

Hi folks! Here are new results of mine: BOINC SETI Worker compiles provided by javalizard 41,522.55 seconds = 11.5h 41,083.40 seconds = 11.4h Alpha-Version from Alex: 18,981.84…

These are the CPU seconds reported for each of the 5 WU turned in so far from the 2Ghz G5 IMac - 10443.78 10924.79 9316.01 11135.24 9133.52 The best times I have seen on the 1.4G…

Quote: Originally Posted by alexkan Well, I may have to ask those of you with machines running 10.3.9 and earlier to be a little more patient. Rick has been looking at the build…

Quote: Originally Posted by mikkyo In order to run gcc 4.0 compiled binaries you need OS X 10.3.9 or 10.4.x. In order for the binaries to run on 10.3.9, you need to link with th…

Quote: Originally Posted by alexkan Shaktai, it seems like your times are a bit faster than the other G5 users' times, even though you're running a slightly slower processor. Is…

Quote: Originally Posted by Shaktai ...Need about 24 of each to get a good sample in order to take the noisy units out of the equation... Shaktai, Here are 14 more from a …

When the time listed is cpu time, then it doesn't matter if you were doing anything else with the computer. If it says 3600 seconds that means that the computer worked on the wu fo…

OK, 10.3.9-compatible client is available (but not really tested) . It's optimized for G4 in general (no specific mtune for either of the two types). Let me know what you guys get.…

Quote: Originally Posted by alexkan OK, 10.3.9-compatible client is available (but not really tested) . It's optimized for G4 in general (no specific mtune for either of the two…

Quote: Originally Posted by Welnic When the time listed is cpu time, then it doesn't matter if you were doing anything else with the computer. You are of course correct. T…

Well the 10.3.9 app is running on the PowerBook. it seems to be working ok, We should have a result in about 3 hours. Regards Phil

Quote: Originally Posted by alexkan Also, if you're using the G5, I realize that I totally screwed up the prefetching. I figure prefetching shouldn't affect the results, but jus…

Ok, the first result is finished on the PowerBook running 10.3.9. Either you guys have performed some real magic or this was a small WU. The time went from over 5 hours to 3 hour…

Quote: Originally Posted by alexkan OK, 10.3.9-compatible client is available (but not really tested) . It's optimized for G4 in general (no specific mtune for either of the two…

Well, I'm not sure how much recompiling there's going to be for now. Rick is away until early next week, and since the SETI validation results aren't back yet, I'm a bit apprehensi…

Well what you have done so far is very fast by comparison to the release version. I wish the validators were moving faster so we could get an answer. Still good work on your part…

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/resul...hostid=1306287 Note that result 102055889 (the earliest one) I did with the standard-issue S@H application, for comparison purposes Results…

Okay folks, I'm running a G5 dual 2.5 ghz machine and have been running Seti Classic forever now. I want to test this out. Is there any chance I can create an account without …

Quote: Originally Posted by Todd Madson Is there any chance I can create an account without killing my old seti classic account since I'm still working on that particular chal…

Well it looks like you may have some sucess. I have my first Validated result from the latest version of your software for the G5. All of the results from this machine have been …

Ditto. Here as well, my first validated unit is from the G5 app. 38 others are still pending, but it looks like we'll start to see more results soon. FYI: I went back to t…

Ok so I know this might be counter productive to processing speed, but I just have to ask. Is there a possibility that you might put the display code back in the app so folks that…

Small number of results done as I don't want to risk validation problems, but on my 1.25GHz Mac Mini, my times have dropped from an average of 21,000 seconds to an average of 11,00…