Quote: Originally Posted by andreas_g4 I don't care what they pay for the new Intel chip, the price tag should have remained the same, and graphics should be better. Too bad…

Quote: Originally Posted by Eug Wanker I would rather have the Radeon 9550, which is what is already in the $999 iBook (which includes a screen). The X1300 is a relatively inex…

From Extreme tech "We can state flatly that if you buy a system using Intel's GMA950 integrated graphics and want to play 3D games, invest at least $60 in an add-on card. If what …

little bit dissapointing. but it will be better with a second rev.

Quote: Originally Posted by WOPR It's ridiculous snobbery like that that makes me embarrassed to be a Mac user. Why not find out some information before posting crap like that? …

Quote: Originally Posted by andreas_g4 While I agree with the first part of your statement, I tend to disagree with the latter. The OS is actually worth that premium. Still, the…

Quote: Originally Posted by Lateralus The IIsi had an expansion slot. The IIsi was $3800 at its introduction according to LowEndMac.com. Voch

With the advances Intel's made, I don't have a problem with integrated graphics per se if you don't game at all. I don't like the price hike with that cut-price graphics chip thoug…

I don't know if there's much to complain about. Any Intel chip powering a "Mac" is an abomination. Remember, you guys wanted an Intel mini.

Quote: Originally Posted by aristobrat Too bad Steve has to answer to stockholders expecting profits instead of you. You are so smart. Of course you aware that everyone kn…

Quote: Originally Posted by andreas_g4 You are so smart. Of course you aware that everyone knows that Apple is responsible for share holders. But you sure don't know if this wil…

Quote: Originally Posted by iKevin Also, didn't Steve mention that you could hook it up to the TV? When I read that it looked as though it was finally a media center type deal.…

I don't think anyone can really comment on the GMA950 versus an ATI9200 until we actually 'test' them. Especially as they pertain to OS X First, let's not delude ourselves and gu…

Here's the iLounge scoop on the newly introduced iPod Hi-Fi: iPod Hi-Fi Home stereo. Reinvented. Looks like a center channel speaker with iPod dock on top. Comes with inserts for …

*puts credit card back in wallet*

I can't believe how poor the design of that thing is. They just yoinked a boom outta some kid's Honda Civic, glued an iPod dock onto it, and painted the whole thing white. Couldn…

I agree... It's "nice" but I guess I was expecting something a little more from Apple with respect to this product. Unless it's one of those products that blows you away when you…

I disagree. I think apple designed this with simplicity as well as catering to the audiophiles out there - I'm much more excited for a great sounding speaker system for my iPod ra…

Maybe I'm lacking Steve's vision, but I'm failing to see how this is worthy of anything but a silent addition to the store. Yeah, it's great that Apple now can make money in the a…

Are you kidding me?! That thing is absolutely hideous! It looks like a speaker enlosure you'd find under the seat of an old Jeep. I wouldn't put that thing in my trunk, much le…

Two big gripes for me. First, price. For $400 I'd buy a new iPod. Yeah, people said the same thing about the iPod when it first came out (I was not one of them), but this is just s…

I think it looks OK.

Quote: Originally Posted by TETENAL I think it looks OK. You think that big white and black brick of plastic looks OK? Different strokes I guess. Look at the way the iP…

I'm not sure a scratched-face ipod woulkd look nearly as nice as the factory-fresh model pictured. Also not sure it would be worth it to pull it out of its case every time I want t…

I'd take this any day over the Chimney Brick.