Quote: Originally Posted by P Hey, I'm trying to be creative here! Sorry, my fault - didn't catch you're from Västkusten.. :> Seriously, I think it's an interesting i…

Quote: Originally Posted by meelk amazing how many people will fight the concept of this because its something windows natively has and osx does not. I work on a site that …

Quote: Originally Posted by Chuckit I think you should be able to drag a new file's proxy icon into a position in the Finder to save it there. That would be a cool feature. …

Quote: Originally Posted by meelk amazing how many people will fight the concept of this because its something windows natively has and osx does not. Which thread have YOU …

Quote: Originally Posted by meelk amazing how many people will fight the concept of this because its something windows natively has and osx does not. Hey, I'm just curious a…

For the record, as a long time Mac user, I absolutely love this feature. J

One thing I don't understand (off topic). There is no keyboard command to make a new Folder in Windows... yet to delete any file or files is ONE KEY. The only ways to make folders …

Quote: Originally Posted by markwm It's not as if the Finder is something the OS X can be proud of, let's be honest. hah. no doubt. When I first used a mac the first thin…

Correct me if I'm wrong but, can't Automator make a new Text file? Simply create an Automator plugin for the Finder that creates a new Text File.

Yup, each iPod has a unique serial number, and iTunes knows how to tell them apart.

Quote: Originally Posted by Dork. Yup, each iPod has a unique serial number, and iTunes knows how to tell them apart. Awesome thanks.

Check the forum FAQ.

right now i have a 6 gig mini, a 4 gig nano and a 60 gig photo connected at the same time through my computer all on one external usb port. have fun

Yeah very lame. I wont buy another iPod till 1. They adopt Firewire again. 2. USB gets lots faster.

i think it was to slim down the size of the pod. I could be wrong, but I believe the FW chipset takes up more room than the USB one.

Quote: Originally Posted by hickey i think it was to slim down the size of the pod. I could be wrong, but I believe the FW chipset takes up more room than the USB one. Per…

oh i wasnt saying i enjoy not having firewire, Im with you on needing FW. USB hurts me sometimes.

Quote: Originally Posted by hickey oh i wasnt saying i enjoy not having firewire, Im with you on needing FW. USB hurts me sometimes. Oh no I know you weren't saying that, …

For an iPod, USB2 is faster and cheaper than Firewire.

Quote: Originally Posted by mduell For an iPod, USB2 is faster and cheaper than Firewire. USB 2 is faster? How so?

Quote: Originally Posted by drainyoo USB 2 is faster? How so? The chipset they're using in the iPods is rather pokey (probably for low-power/heat) and USB2 comes out on top…

Quote: Originally Posted by mduell For an iPod, USB2 is faster and cheaper than Firewire. No, USB 2.0 is overall SLOWER than Firewire This has been gone over so many times…

Quote: Originally Posted by mduell The chipset they're using in the iPods is rather pokey (probably for low-power/heat) and USB2 comes out on top for transfer rates. Here are s…

Quote: Originally Posted by Kevin No, USB 2.0 is overall SLOWER than Firewire This has been gone over so many times. http://www.barefeats.com/usb2.html It "has been gone…

Quote: Originally Posted by mduell 1000 songs (assuming ~4MB/song) should take about 9 minutes over USB2 (based the benchmarks from CNet). Are you using USB1? USB1 would take ~1…