Well, *nothing* is "impossible". But those jacks on the right are either SMD, in which case they need a very precise and experienced hand to be replaced, or regular soldered, in w…

To get to the area behind the screen is very easy, it will only take a few minutes to get to. The hard part is actually soldering it back on. It would prob be easier just to buy a …

My original 20Gb G2 ipod got a crack in the 'inner circle' of the headphone jack - this caused the unit to short circuit when you used the in-line remote cable, and it would flash …

Quote: Originally posted by LeeG: My original 20Gb G2 ipod got a crack in the 'inner circle' of the headphone jack - this caused the unit to short circuit when you used …

Yeah mine was August 2002, I found using just the headphones (no in-line remote) worked, but I got it fixed in March 2003 (less than 1 yr) so warranty prevailed. I wonder what the …

an update: my ipod is still hanging in there, barely. the new sennheiser cans that i bought for my home stereo also work with the ipod, and don't cause it to spontaneously shut off…

Nope -- and there was a thread about this just a few lines down. tooki

Damn. Sorry, the title of the thread didn't draw my attention. Hmmm, maybe Tiger allows to use an AXpress station as a sound output ...

It would definitely be cool. I don't really see why Apple didn't just do that to begin with. tooki

The problem is how your computers are set up. Using the router, they no longer connect to the Internet; they now connect to a LAN. You can (and should) also set up your router to…

Just to add to what GHPorter said, D-link also provides a fairly decent online help file as well as help in its browser interface. If you don't know what a setting does, click on t…

Exactly. And make sure you turn off PPPoE on the Macs if you have it turned on.

Quote: Originally posted by John Strung: Exactly. And make sure you turn off PPPoE on the Macs if you have it turned on. Thanks guys, But the trouble was with the …

Functionality is what you wanted and needed, so I'm glad you got it.

Most C compilers look for main to be declared like: int main(int argc, char* argv[]) Then add: return 0; at the end of main method.

Quote: Originally posted by iPhotoStuff: Hi Folks, now, I read in a bunch of places that different compilers require different returns for main? Frankly, I have no idea…

the return value usually just tells the OS the exit status of the program. Just change that main function to read: int main() { ... } and at the end of the program before the last…

another spot that discusses something similar to this question is down a little ways titled "help please" posted by zanyterp . . . (me). perhaps can help little bit more. . . .whi…

Quote: Originally posted by zanyterp: while on this topic here, if i declare a function that main() calls, does void functionName() work? (including the ';' as needed of…

Quote: Originally posted by zanyterp: another spot that discusses something similar to this question is down a little ways titled "help please" posted by zanyterp . . . …

Quote: Originally posted by PBG4 User: Yes, you can create void functions. It's just that some compilers expect the main method to be declared as int main... The C+…

Quote: Originally posted by Chuckit: void functionName(); is a valid declaration. You should just be including the header file, though. so instead of declaring the…

Normally you declare your functions in a header file and define them in an implementation file. Like this: code:// SomeClass.h #ifndef SOMECLASS_H #define SOMECLASS_H class Some…

Quote: Originally posted by Chuckit: Normally you declare your functions in a header file and define them in an implementation file. Like this: code:// SomeClass.h #if…

Well, you don't want to include a file that's going to be compiled in another file that's going to be compiled. That will just confuse things. Also, header files do make your desig…