Quote: Originally posted by aquapaul: Hmmm. Well that *should* work, but my mv (/bin/mv) only supports the -f -i switches. Yeah, my bad. I was confusing cp and rm …

For some reason when I try to declare an array of 234,936 strings in C++ on OS X I get a seg fault. When i do it in Linux it works fine. Why is it doing this? Is there some way …

Quote: Originally posted by nonhuman: <STRONG>For some reason when I try to declare an array of 234,936 strings in C++ on OS X I get a seg fault. When i do it in …

Ok, thanks. I'll try that out.

Either that or change the size of the stack limitation (ulimit stack, for example).

Ok, stupid question: How do you declare an array dynamically? Is it <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1"face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial">code:</font><HR><pre>&lt…

string* dictionary = new string[size]; did that not work? if you don't have to use a bare array (if this isn't homework or something), i'd suggest an stl container. std::vector o…

Well do you remember it? That unbelievably simple graphing tool for OS 7 or whatever it was. Well, it still runs in classic, but it would kick major booty if there was a program li…

Yeah, I miss CricketGraph. If you need basic graphs, Excel v.X should be fine. I use Deltagraph (mostly for scientific data and EPS output) but have to boot into OS 9...

Excel for Mac OSX does a pretty full range of graphs these days including log scales and a whole bunch of curve fitting trendlines. I used to use Cricket Graph years ago. If you w…

man, what a flashback! I loved Cricket Graph. Sure, Excel can do it now, but I can't afford it! $450 my A$$.

Excel as it comes cannot graph the kind of stuff I need. It took 300 lines of VBA code to get it to graph the kind of logarithmic graphs I needed. But Cricket Graph could do it, …

I never really liked cricket graph. Try Igor Pro 4. In my opinion, this is and has been the best graphing program available for the past 5 years, and they have an OSX version.

I have very fond memories of Cricket Graph. It was an impressive little program; much better (and faster) than Excel. I used to use Cricket Graph in college for all my material s…

I still use Cricket Graph 90% of the time. I recently tried GraphPad Prism for OSX. Really nice graphing program, but Expen$ive. I really wish there were a Canvas compatible graph…

The creation date on my copy of Cricketgraph is July 15, 1986. Can't believe I have 16-year-old sofware on my computer that still runs! (though I don't really use it since I'm usin…

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-se…

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-se…

What version of SuperPaint? I have some version 3.5 disks sitting around that I've been meaning to install so I can resurrect some of my own old artwork.

I really miss Cricketgraph - I use Deltagraph now (in classic), but CG was SO much more intuitive to use. Ah well....I have tried the other options listed here, but none of them c…

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-se…

Quote: Originally posted by Rickster: What version of SuperPaint? I have some version 3.5 disks sitting around that I've been meaning to install so I can resurrect some …

Quote: Originally posted by foamy: I still use Cricket Graph 90% of the time. I recently tried GraphPad Prism for OSX. Really nice graphing program, but Expen$ive. I re…

We have MacVector and GCK. I don't like either of them for day to day use. I got DNA Strider for OSX and I'm pretty happy. DNA Strider is the Cricket Graph of DNA analysis progr…

Quote: Originally posted by Rickster: What version of SuperPaint? I have some version 3.5 disks sitting around that I've been meaning to install so I can resurrect some …