MySpace just has too much junk loading. It is probably all of the Windows Media Player stuff loading in the background which Safari really cannot handle well (even with the approp…

If you're having significant problems w/ MySpace, consider going over to webkit.opendarwin.org and trying a nightly, or filing a bug, or both even! be sure to read the instruction…

Quote: Originally Posted by TETENAL Camino and Firefox use the same rendering engine. Correct. Also, if anyone is running on an Intel Mac you should try the Intel build of …

Quote: Originally Posted by TETENAL Camino and Firefox use the same rendering engine. Really? I was thinking Camino's was something other than Gecko, but now that I actually…

A. Safari IS slow. It may be faster at starting up, but the likes of Gecko wipes the floor with it. B. Many MySpace pages are full of garbage. WMVs, BMPs, scripts, Flash, wild…

Basically its just down to how badly coded Myspace is, just looking at the CSS file you can tell the developers don't have a clue what they're doing or how to use things like CSS c…

safari is slow i guess but i didn't find camino any faster. i mean it seemed a little faster but i didn't like certain things. i'll wait for firefox.

MySpace is a garbage app written by someone who clearly doesn't understand scale in one of the worst platforms for web apps--cold fusion. It's amazing that so many people fawn ove…

Consider it a blessing.

Quote: Originally Posted by sushiism Basically its just down to how badly coded Myspace is, just looking at the CSS file you can tell the developers don't have a clue what they'…

I've been directed to a few Myspace pages. Mostly they were "enthusiastically" produced but lacked coherence. This happens when you let someone run wild with web construction too…

At any given time there are millions of people on myspace. I use Camino and sometimes it hangs up trying to load into the log in screen. Depends on the time of day too. I try to…

but windows computers still run those pages a lot faster. i guess cuz its written more for IE right?

Quote: Originally Posted by Elixir but windows computers still run those pages a lot faster. i guess cuz its written more for IE right? DING DING DING!!!! We have a winne…

though I am not a supporter of myspace, and a firm believer that some friendships are meant to fade away and that you're better off picking your dates at a bar. I have to admit hav…

Yea, buying slower games with later release dates is soooo attractive.

I still think that the number of people who will actually be dual-booting their Macs on a regular basis is somewhat limit. Sure, the kind of people who post to tech message boards …

If/when I get an Intel Mac.... I'd buy and support hybrid releases (like Blizzard's), but no, I wouldn't wait 6-9 months to purchase pricier, slower-running Mac ports if I had an …

I'd consider running a near-real speed virtual PC to do games, but wouldn't bother flipping systems back and forth just to play games, IMO.

I'm not a hard core gamer. I don't mind waiting, and frankly I don't mind paying $10 more for a quality port. Doom 3, Myst 5, Halo were all worth the wait. Crappy ports (do you …

I said this once, I said I'd be going to hell for suggesting this but... If people are going to pull this stunt, it'd be best to pirate the PC version and then buy the Mac version…

I'm all for supporting Mac development when possible, but why reward people for making a bad port?

I think when Mac porting houses only port to Intel Macs, they will be a faster process.

Quote: Originally Posted by macintologist I think when Mac porting houses only port to Intel Macs, they will be a faster process. What makes you think that? My understanding…

I'm a PC XP user on an aging 800MHz Compaq from 2000, and I've bought far more games for it than i ever did with my old G1 PowerMac. But if I were to every buy an Intel Mac, I'd s…