#8
Sun, 29 Jun 2008 - 22:22
one of the problems you could be having, is interfearance inside the CPU itself. If you get it too fast, you may be causing electricity to cause interfearance from the heat INSIDE the die, and not on the surface. Despite being able to get rid of heat on the surface, the inside of the die may actually be much hotter than the ceramic/metal on the cop of the CPU. It also could be arcing electricy causing interfearance and bad data inside the chip. So i would say, either buy a faster CPU, or drop the speed. 50Mhz isn't going to make too much difference, especially with OS X being more reliant on the GPU than the cpu. I would drop the CPU to 450, then get a better Graphics card. It will pay off more in the end, and see more responsiveness from that.
Also, if you want better speed, use 10.3.9, and stay away from 10.2, and 10.4 . those are the worst offending systems on a slower system like yours. 10.3.9 is optimaized best for systems under 700Mhz, and it will prevent uneeded servise (like Dashboar) from loading, and reduce processing power needed to run the kernel. It would be the perfect system for that.
I use 10.3.9 on my lombard, as it's faster than 10.2, and doesn't have the bulk that 10.4 puts on it. So it's not like I am getting the features I want, but it also doesn't have the bog down and bloat coding of 10.2
I personally think that 10.3 is THE BEST for sub-1Ghz systems. Even 10.4 seemed slow on my 1.2Ghz iBook G4.
Get a faster or dual powermac G4 before spending any more on that B&W/Yikes!. it's not worth trying to get more power from a system that old. Either that, or stick with 10.3
BTW, if you upgrade the GPU, make sure you get one that can utilize the 66Mhz Slot, or if you can, get one that is 64-bit (yeah, i know, it's hard to) but that will give you the best through-put and system speed increase that you will notice a HUGE Differnce. CPU speed is overrated under OS X.