Smith The Past Present And Future Of The Macintosh Desktop Semaphore Signal
Smith The Past Present And Future Of The Macintosh Desktop Semaphore Signal
Lisa · 1986 · PDF
| Filename | Smith_-_The_Past_Present_and_Future_of_the_Macintosh_Desktop_-_Semaphore_Signal_198603.pdf |
|---|---|
| Size | 0.08 MB |
| Year | 1986 |
| Subsection | development_history / articles |
| Downloads | 1 |
Enjoying MacTrove?
Anonymous downloads are free and unlimited.
Create a free account to track favorites,
contribute metadata corrections, and join the
community chat.
Reader
Loading…
OCR / Text contents
The Past, Present, and Future of the Macintosh Desktop
Dan Smith Interview, Semaphore Signal March, 1986
To a first-time user, perhaps the most striking thing about the Macintosh is its use
of the desktop metaphor: the folders and other icons intended to help make the
Macintosh a user-friendly machine.
For a perspective on where those ideas came from, how they were further
developed by Apple, and what they might lead to in the future,we interviewed Dan
Smith, an Apple Principal Software Engineer.
Signal: Give us a brief history of your career at Apple.
Smith: I've been at Apple for a little over five years now. I initially signed on to the
Lisa project to work on what we called the Desktop Manager, essentially the
equivalent of the Finder on the Macintosh. I worked on that for about two
years,until the whole Lisa project was near completion. Then I became User
Interface Coordinator for the Lisa project, then switched to a consulting role for
theMacintosh, since Mac picked up about halfway into the Lisa development stage.
I took some time off from the Macintosh and Lisa to start working on some future
projects, did that for about nine months, then got pressed back into service to do a
program development environment for the Macintosh, which is what I'm working
on right now.
Signal: Were you the desktop programmer? What was the organization responsible
for the desktop and the other Lisa software?
Smith: The effort was split up into a couple of different groups. There was the
desktop group. Two of us actually did the implementation. I programmed the user
interface portion, and Frank Ludolph did a fair amount of the lower level
implementation. Then there was the applications group, and that was split up into
essentially the different applications that came out: LisaDraw, LisaWrite, and so
on. There was also an operating system group, which did the much lower level
software.
Signal: How did the ideas for the desktop originate, and how were they
incorporated into your design?
Smith: That's a pretty interesting story. When I started at Apple, the idea of the
desktop hadn't really quite been born. In fact, it was thought we'd do something
fairly simple, and it would be a one-person job for a couple of months and it would
be over. It was a little later in the project that we realized the desktop was going to
be a central part of the entire system. The idea of an iconic form didn't come along
until quite late into the development of the product. We started off with something
that was pretty Smalltalk-like. There was a notion of a thing called a browser,
which is essentially a table you could flip through, listing the documents you had in
a hierarchical fashion. But the whole initial desktop was essentially technically
oriented. We went through iteration after iteration. I remember doing prototype
after prototype, and trying them on several groups of people, getting it to be more
and more useable. But a number of us were not happy with what we were gettin…
Showing first 3,000 characters of 29,183 total. Open the full document →