Netsurf can run on quite low end machines... I guess it is possible it could work ok. The machines I usually run it on are relatively beefy (50-85Mhz sparcstations) but... I see no reason an SE/30 couldn't run it well enough. Certainly my Powerbook 190 could run it... and Netsurf would likely render better than iCab. Another possiblity would be to grab the FLTK 1.1 source as a starting point and merge classic mac suport back into FLTK 1.3 that way you could havea shot at building Dillo or Dplus. The netsurf developers a great guys also they helped me straighen out an endianness bug a few months back on big endian arches.
If you are unable to get a compiler that can build the netsurf libraries... perhaps you can try out that Retro68 gcc based cross compiler assuming MPW etc.. can link to the binaries it builds. Apparently you need a copy of the universal headers to use it though.
Why not VNC? ... well why not just use the machine VNC is running on at that point.....
If you go the coprocessor route... in order to maintain coolness
... I suggest FPGA that way you could put a second 68k core on there or somthing cool like that. among other things. I think thats sort of how those radius rocket cards work (they essentially slap a mac on a card as an accelerator right?)
Btw you current progress looks excellent!
If you are unable to get a compiler that can build the netsurf libraries... perhaps you can try out that Retro68 gcc based cross compiler assuming MPW etc.. can link to the binaries it builds. Apparently you need a copy of the universal headers to use it though.
Why not VNC? ... well why not just use the machine VNC is running on at that point.....
If you go the coprocessor route... in order to maintain coolness
... I suggest FPGA that way you could put a second 68k core on there or somthing cool like that. among other things. I think thats sort of how those radius rocket cards work (they essentially slap a mac on a card as an accelerator right?)Btw you current progress looks excellent!