Skip to main content
Home▸ Forums▸ 68kMLA▸ ROMs, ROMs, ROMs! — #11
Post #11 by slomacuser
Source Forum68kMLA
Category68k
Post DateFri, 10 Apr 2009 - 08:38
Original URLhttps://68kmla.org/bb/threads/roms-roms-roms.17085/
Post
However, the Mac II port (which will be the next thing finished) will also do that and run all the same software and allow for a 640x480 color display – a much more useful development. There are enough differences in the 64K ROMs that they will not run some later software and vice-versa with the 128K ROMs. As far as emulators go, the specific hardware enabled by the various ROMs is moot. There are no SCSI ports, no expansion cards, no floppy disks, or any other hardware a specific ROM would take advantage of. The only advantage of a specific ROM is in the software emulation. Newer software is not likely to work with older ROMs and some older software will not run under newer ROMs. That means, depending on the software you want to run, having a ROM that is contemporary with it, or at least incorporates the code necessary to support features of the software.
I wonder why was the Mac II ROM chosen to be emulated as I know Apple emulated Mac LC on PPC, and other companies used LC ROMS too, like Daydream that made Mac emulator fo Next Computers

etc and as LC's are more easy to find (dead or a live), there would be no problem having actually physically the ROM so it wouldn't be so called "illegal" having a emulator?
mp.ls