avw, thanks for trying, at least. It seems the new YT layout has screwed up a lot of other older browsers, too.
Nathan, HTML 5 is in my pipeline, but not imminent (I FAQed this since I get asked it a fair bit
). Many of the document tags are secretly already in the parser, but the really glitzy stuff will be hard. I might support and by, if nothing else, offering download links, but this also requires a piece on the other side to translate the video into something QT 6.0.3 can play (i.e., also porting ffmpeg, or at least libavcodec). That's getting a little ahead of myself, especially since I don't have HTML 4.01 working fully yet (getting there!).
I'm ploughing through the diffs for JavaScript in the meantime. Btw, Classilla 9.1 even in its old brown state can run the SunSpider benchmark. Just be prepared for a long wait: on my TiBook/867, it clocked in at a horrific 53000+ ms. For comparison, Classilla 9.1 under Classic on my quad G5 took 25000+ ms, and Firefox 3.6.3 on the same hardware took just 4100. Got some work to do there.
Nathan, HTML 5 is in my pipeline, but not imminent (I FAQed this since I get asked it a fair bit
). Many of the document tags are secretly already in the parser, but the really glitzy stuff will be hard. I might support and by, if nothing else, offering download links, but this also requires a piece on the other side to translate the video into something QT 6.0.3 can play (i.e., also porting ffmpeg, or at least libavcodec). That's getting a little ahead of myself, especially since I don't have HTML 4.01 working fully yet (getting there!).I'm ploughing through the diffs for JavaScript in the meantime. Btw, Classilla 9.1 even in its old brown state can run the SunSpider benchmark. Just be prepared for a long wait: on my TiBook/867, it clocked in at a horrific 53000+ ms. For comparison, Classilla 9.1 under Classic on my quad G5 took 25000+ ms, and Firefox 3.6.3 on the same hardware took just 4100. Got some work to do there.